Literature DB >> 18952358

Analysis of medical emergency team calls comparing subjective to "objective" call criteria.

Nancy Santiano1, Lis Young, Ken Hillman, Michael Parr, Sanjay Jayasinghe, La-Stacey Baramy, Jayne Stevenson, Tracey Heath, Cassandra Chan, Maree Claire, Gail Hanger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the reasons why nursing staff use the subjective "worried" Medical Emergency Team (MET) calling criterion and compare the outcomes of calls activated using the "worried" criterion with those calls activated using "objective" criteria such as vital sign abnormalities.
METHODS: A descriptive study of MET calls in six acute hospitals over a 12 months period. Outcomes for "objective" and "worried" calls were compared.
RESULTS: The "worried" criterion was used to activate 29% of 3194 MET calls studied; it was the single most common reason for a MET call. Half (51.7%) of the "worried" calls were related to problems with Airway, Breathing, Circulation or Neurology. 'Breathing' problems accounted for the largest proportion (35.2%). A low oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) (n=249, 26.9%) and 'respiratory distress' (n=133, 14.4%) were the most common reasons for a "worried" call. Only 1.1% (10) of calls triggered by the "worried" criteria had cardiac arrest as an outcome compared with 170 calls (7.6%) for "objective" criteria. The proportion of patients who remained in a general ward area after MET calls was higher for the "worried" calls.
CONCLUSIONS: The "worried" criterion was the most frequent reason for MET calls, implying a high degree of empowerment and independent action by nursing staff. Low SpO2 and respiratory distress were the most common causes for concern. There was a significant difference between MET calls triggered by "worried" criteria and "objective" criteria for outcomes immediately following MET (p < 0.001). Further assessment and refinement of MET triggers particularly in relation to respiratory distress and pulse oximetry may be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952358     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of paediatric alert criteria for identifying hospitalised children at risk of critical deterioration.

Authors:  Susan M Chapman; Michael P W Grocott; Linda S Franck
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Ten clinical indicators suggesting the need for ICU admission after Rapid Response Team review.

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Michael DeVita; Stephen Warrillow
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Temporal distribution of instability events in continuously monitored step-down unit patients: implications for Rapid Response Systems.

Authors:  Marilyn Hravnak; Lujie Chen; Artur Dubrawski; Eliezer Bose; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Risk for Cardiorespiratory Instability Following Transfer to a Monitored Step-Down Unit.

Authors:  Eliezer Bose; Lujie Chen; Gilles Clermont; Artur Dubrawski; Michael R Pinsky; Dianxu Ren; Leslie A Hoffman; Marilyn Hravnak
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 5.  Nurses' worry or concern and early recognition of deteriorating patients on general wards in acute care hospitals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gooske Douw; Lisette Schoonhoven; Tineke Holwerda; Getty Huisman-de Waal; Arthur R H van Zanten; Theo van Achterberg; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Factors influencing the activation of the rapid response system for clinically deteriorating patients by frontline ward clinicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wei Ling Chua; Min Ting Alicia See; Helena Legio-Quigley; Daryl Jones; Augustine Tee; Sok Ying Liaw
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  First report based on the online registry of a Japanese multicenter rapid response system: a descriptive study of 35 institutions in Japan.

Authors:  Takaki Naito; Shinsuke Fujiwara; Tatsuya Kawasaki; Yoshiki Sento; Taka-Aki Nakada; Masayasu Arai; Kazuaki Atagi; Shigeki Fujitani
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2019-09-08

8.  The fifth vital sign? Nurse worry predicts inpatient deterioration within 24 hours.

Authors:  Santiago Romero-Brufau; Kim Gaines; Clara T Nicolas; Matthew G Johnson; Joel Hickman; Jeanne M Huddleston
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-08-28

9.  Effectiveness of the Medical Emergency Team: the importance of dose.

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael A DeVita
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Performance of the Afferent Limb of Rapid Response Systems in Managing Deteriorating Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marcello Difonzo
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2019-10-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.