Literature DB >> 18952261

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve.

Jamison Jaffe1, Sean Castellucci, Xavier Cathelineau, Justin Harmon, François Rozet, Eric Barret, Guy Vallancien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at a high-volume conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) center, to determine whether a learning curve still exists.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 293 consecutive men underwent RALP between May 2000 and November 2006. We prospectively collected and reviewed patient data including the preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score, operative duration, and blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and pathologic Gleason score and margin status.
RESULTS: Mean operative duration for the entire group was 158 +/- 50 minutes, blood loss was 533 +/- 416 mL, hospital duration was 5 days, and mean age was 61 years. Operative time showed a statistically significant decline at 2 different breakpoints: after the first 12 cases, and after 189 cases, dividing the patients into 3 groups. Operative times were 242 +/- 64, 165 +/- 43, and 134 +/- 45 minutes, respectively, for each group. We also evaluated margin status in the 3 groups. The positive margin rate in each group was 7/12 (58%), 41/180 (23%), and 10/89 (9%), which was statistically significant. Foley catheter duration was also statistically significant among groups. Age, preoperative Gleason score, and PSA were statistically significant between the second and third groups. There was no statistical significance demonstrated in blood loss, postoperative Gleason score, and length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Urologists who are proficient in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy will still have a learning curve when first performing an RALP. Experienced laparoscopic surgeons demonstrated continued improvement in operative and pathologic parameters with regard to operative duration and positive margin rate as their experience grew.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952261     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Achieving proficiency with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Laparoscopic-trained versus robotics-trained surgeons.

Authors:  Brian Kim; Allen Chang; Jennifer Kaswick; Armen Derboghossians; Howard Jung; Jeff Slezak; Melanie Wuerstle; Stephen G Williams; Gary W Chien
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Joseph J Pariser; Sanjay G Patel; Blake B Anderson; Scott E Eggener; Gregory P Zagaja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Positive surgical margin rates during the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Authors:  Anthony F Adili; Julia Di Giovanni; Emma Kolesar; Nathan C Wong; Jen Hoogenes; Shawn Dason; Bobby Shayegan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Diffusion of robotics into clinical practice in the United States: process, patient safety, learning curves, and the public health.

Authors:  Hossein S Mirheydar; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a secondary training hospital: operation time, treatment outcomes, and complications with the accumulation of experience.

Authors:  Do Young Seo; Hee Ju Cho; Jeong Man Cho; Jung Yoon Kang; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-08-07

7.  Assessing the complications of laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery: the case of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thierry Lebeau; Morgan Rouprêt; Karim Ferhi; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; François Richard; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Christophe Vaessen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: analysis of an experienced open surgeon's learning curve after 300 procedures.

Authors:  Nicolas Doumerc; Carlo Yuen; Richard Savdie; Md Bayzidur Rahman; Ruth Pe Benito; Phillip Stricker
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-01-22

9.  Early assessment of patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Eun Yong Choi; Jeongyun Jeong; Dong Il Kang; Kelly Johnson; Thomas Jang; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-08-29

10.  Learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pathologic t2 disease.

Authors:  Jae Won Lee; Woo Ju Jeong; Sung Yul Park; Enrique I S Loreazo; Cheol Kyu Oh; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.