Literature DB >> 18952147

Improvement of visual scanning after DC brain polarization of parietal cortex in stroke patients with spatial neglect.

Myoung-Hwan Ko1, Sang-Hyoung Han, Sung-Hee Park, Jeong-Hwan Seo, Yun-Hee Kim.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that transcranial direct current (DC) brain polarization can modulate cortical excitability in the human brain. We investigated the effect of anodal DC brain polarization of right parietal cortex on visuospatial scanning in subacute stroke patients with spatial neglect. The patients underwent two neglect tests - figure cancellation and line bisection - before and immediately after anodal DC or sham in a double-blind protocol. Anodal DC was applied to the scalp over the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) with an intensity of 2.0 mA for 20 min. Anodal DC brain polarization, but not sham, led to significant improvement in the both neglect tests. These results document a beneficial effect of DC brain polarization on neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952147     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; David Wolk; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy maps cortical plasticity underlying altered motor performance induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Timea Hodics; Nathan Hervey; George Kondraske; Ann M Stowe; George Alexandrakis
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation accelerates allocentric target detection.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Jacques Beauvais; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; H Branch Coslett; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Recent trends in rehabilitation interventions for visual neglect and anosognosia for hemiplegia following right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Kathleen B Kortte; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2011-01-01

6.  A double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot study to assess the effects of the concomitant use of transcranial direct current stimulation with the computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation to the prefrontal cortex on cognitive functions in patients with stroke.

Authors:  See-Hyun Park; Eun-Jeong Koh; Ha-Young Choi; Myoung-Hwan Ko
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-12-31

7.  Posterior parietal cortex is critical for the encoding, consolidation, and retrieval of a memory that guides attention for learning.

Authors:  Felipe L Schiffino; Vivian Zhou; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sarah Marchina; Jessica M Pisegna; Joseph M Massaro; Susan E Langmore; Courtney McVey; Jeffrey Wang; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-21

10.  Non-invasive brain stimulation in neglect rehabilitation: an update.

Authors:  René Martin Müri; Dario Cazzoli; Tobias Nef; Urs P Mosimann; Simone Hopfner; Thomas Nyffeler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.