Literature DB >> 18952108

Tracking prey or tracking the prey's resource? Mechanisms of movement and optimal habitat selection by predators.

Samuel M Flaxman1, Yuan Lou.   

Abstract

We synthesize previous theory on ideal free habitat selection to develop a model of predator movement mechanisms, when both predators and prey are mobile. We consider a continuous environment with an arbitrary distribution of resources, randomly diffusing prey that consume the resources, and predators that consume the prey. Our model introduces a very general class of movement rules in which the overall direction of a predator's movement is determined by a variable combination of (i) random diffusion, (ii) movement in the direction of higher prey density, and/or (iii) movement in the direction of higher density of the prey's resource. With this model, we apply an adaptive dynamics approach to two main questions. First, can it be adaptive for predators to base their movement solely on the density of the prey's resource (which the predators do not consume)? Second, should predator movements be exclusively biased toward higher densities of prey/resources, or is there an optimal balance between random and biased movements? We find that, for some resource distributions, predators that track the gradient of the prey's resource have an advantage compared to predators that track the gradient of prey directly. Additionally, we show that matching (consumers distributed in proportion to resources), overmatching (consumers strongly aggregated in areas of high resource density), and undermatching (consumers distributed more uniformly than resources) distributions can all be explained by the same general habitat selection mechanism. Our results provide important groundwork for future investigations of predator-prey dynamics.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952108     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  5 in total

1.  Human activity helps prey win the predator-prey space race.

Authors:  Tyler B Muhly; Christina Semeniuk; Alessandro Massolo; Laura Hickman; Marco Musiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Foraging Behaviour in Magellanic Woodpeckers Is Consistent with a Multi-Scale Assessment of Tree Quality.

Authors:  Pablo M Vergara; Gerardo E Soto; Darío Moreira-Arce; Amanda D Rodewald; Luis O Meneses; Christian G Pérez-Hernández
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Diet reveals links between morphology and foraging in a cryptic temperate reef fish.

Authors:  Natalia S Winkler; Maite Paz-Goicoechea; Robert W Lamb; Alejandro Pérez-Matus
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Two-Species Migration and Clustering in Two-Dimensional Domains.

Authors:  Lawrence Kurowski; Andrew L Krause; Hanako Mizuguchi; Peter Grindrod; Robert A Van Gorder
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of plant-herbivore interactions under predation risk: the tale of bison foraging in wolf country.

Authors:  Léa Harvey; Daniel Fortin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.