Literature DB >> 18951696

Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups.

Mari Sundli Tveit1.   

Abstract

Landscape change alters the visual scale of agricultural landscapes, as production units get larger and strips of taller vegetation are removed between smaller units. Visual scale, defined as the perceptual units reflecting the experience of landscape rooms, visibility and openness, is considered a key factor shaping landscape preference. The visual expression of landscapes affects people in many ways; aesthetic appreciation, health and well being. In order to understand how landscape changes alter the visual scale of landscapes, and hence its effect on human beings, it is important to establish efficient and practical ways of measuring visual scale and its relation to landscape preferences. This paper presents an empirical test of the ability to predict landscape preference of two photo-based indicators of visual scale; percentage open land in the view and size of landscape rooms. A preference survey was conducted with two groups of respondents; a student group from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB) and a public group. The student group was chosen to represent future landscape professionals. Photos of landscapes varying in the expression of visual scale were shown to survey respondents, who were asked to give scores according to how much they liked the landscapes. Both indicators were found to be predictors of preference for the student group, but not for the public group. The results demonstrate that student preferences do not reflect the landscape preferences of the wider public. The different appreciation of visual scale in the landscape of future landscape professionals and the public implies that experts wanting to reflect preferences of the wider public should be cautious when evaluating the visual impact of landscape change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18951696     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  13 in total

1.  Assessing public aesthetic preferences towards some urban landscape patterns: the case study of two different geographic groups.

Authors:  Ziyue Chen; Bing Xu; Bernard Devereux
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Continental-scale quantification of landscape values using social media data.

Authors:  Boris T van Zanten; Derek B Van Berkel; Ross K Meentemeyer; Jordan W Smith; Koen F Tieskens; Peter H Verburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Assessment of visual landscape quality using IKONOS imagery.

Authors:  Ulas Yunus Ozkan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: a literature review on restorativeness.

Authors:  Rita Berto
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2014-10-21

5.  Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the "Soft" Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK.

Authors:  Agne Prochorskaite; Chris Couch; Naglis Malys; Vida Maliene
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Cultural ecosystem services of mountain regions: Modelling the aesthetic value.

Authors:  Uta Schirpke; Florian Timmermann; Ulrike Tappeiner; Erich Tasser
Journal:  Ecol Indic       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.958

7.  Social media reveal that charismatic species are not the main attractor of ecotourists to sub-Saharan protected areas.

Authors:  Anna Hausmann; Tuuli Toivonen; Vuokko Heikinheimo; Henrikki Tenkanen; Rob Slotow; Enrico Di Minin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Greenway Cyclists' Visual Perception and Landscape Imagery Assessment.

Authors:  Hui He; Jiamin Li; Xiaowu Lin; Yanwei Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  The public and professionals reason similarly about the management of non-native invasive species: a quantitative investigation of the relationship between beliefs and attitudes.

Authors:  Anke Fischer; Sebastian Selge; René van der Wal; Brendon M H Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative assessment of public opinion on the landscape quality of two biosphere reserves in Europe.

Authors:  Barbara Sowińska-Świerkosz; Tadeusz J Chmielewski
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.