Literature DB >> 18951253

An evaluation of patients' willingness to trade symptom-free days for asthma-related treatment risks: a discrete choice experiment.

Helen M McTaggart-Cowan1, Peilin Shi, J Mark Fitzgerald, Aslam H Anis, Jacek A Kopec, Tony R Bai, Judith A Soon, Larry D Lynd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Not taking treatment preferences into account may lead to patients' inappropriate use of asthma treatments. The objective of this study was to quantify these preferences, in terms of risk-benefits trade-offs, for six asthma treatment attributes using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
METHODS: Adult asthma patients (n = 157) participated in the study. The custom-designed DCE measured preferences for treatment effectiveness (symptom-free days), potential risk (oral thrush and tremor/heart palpitation), ease of use (frequency of daily administration and number of inhalers required), and cost. A nested logit model was used to determine the relative preferences of each attribute, from which the marginal rates of substitution were calculated. Segmented models were used to test for interactions between cost and treatment benefit with socioeconomic status and medication use.
RESULTS: Relationships between preferences and all attributes were in the hypothesized direction. On average, patients were willing to pay an additional $14 per month to receive one additional symptom-free day, and $26, $79, and $112 monthly to avoid one, two, and three annual episodes of oral thrush, respectively. Income and the magnitude of short-acting beta -agonist use also affected treatment preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, asthma patients desired treatments that offered more symptom-free days, but they were willing to trade days without symptoms in exchange for a reduction in adverse events and greater convenience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18951253     DOI: 10.1080/02770900802126990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  12 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Pradnya Naik-Panvelkar; Carol Armour; John M Rose; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Patient-centered care and its effect on outcomes in the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Nashmia Qamar; Andrea A Pappalardo; Vineet M Arora; Valerie G Press
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-03-06

Review 5.  The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Dan Rigby; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A tolerability burden index in schizophrenia: incorporating patient perspective in clinical trial adverse event reporting.

Authors:  Clément François; Alice Guiraud-Diawara; Christophe Lançon; Pierre Michel Llorca; Ann Hartry; Lene Hammer-Helmich; Djamel A Zighed; Adrian Tanasescu; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-09-13

7.  Maintenance inhaler therapy preferences of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Tommi Tervonen; Natalia Hawken; Nicola A Hanania; Fernando J Martinez; Sebastian Heidenreich; Ileen Gilbert
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Preferences of patients with asthma or COPD for treatments in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kathrin Damm; Heidrun Lingner; Katharina Schmidt; Ines Aumann-Suslin; Heike Buhr-Schinner; Jochen van der Meyden; Konrad Schultz
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-04-17

Review 9.  Patient preferences in severe COPD and asthma: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Basil G Bereza; Anders Troelsgaard Nielsen; Sverrir Valgardsson; Michiel E H Hemels; Thomas R Einarson
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-04-08

10.  Understanding patient preferences and willingness to pay for hemophilia therapies.

Authors:  Shraddha S Chaugule; Joel W Hay; Guy Young
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.