Literature DB >> 18951045

Do microspheres with narrow or standard size distributions localize differently in vasculature? An experimental study in sheep kidney and uterus.

Alex Laurent1, Elodie Velzenberger, Michel Wassef, Jean-Pierre Pelage, Andrew L Lewis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare standard embolization microspheres (SMS) with microspheres of very narrow size distribution in terms of physical properties and relative distribution within sheep kidney and uterine artery models of embolization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard microspheres (SMS; 500-700 mum and 700-900 mum) were compared with narrow microspheres (NMS) of the same material made with a microfluidic method that produced a much narrower size distribution (600 mum and 800 mum). Characterization of both microspheres was performed in vitro (ie, bead size, water content, and compressive modulus). In the sheep model of kidney and uterus embolization, histopathologic analysis was performed to determine the average vessel size occluded, the number of microspheres per vessel, and the deformation in vivo, with a focus on the localization of the products within the different vascular zones of the organ tissues.
RESULTS: In vitro testing showed the physical properties of NMS to be similar to those of SMS. SMS and NMS also possessed the same degree of deformation in vivo. In both embolization models, there were no major differences in the localization of SMS compared with NMS of equivalent mean bead diameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with SMS with a normal distribution in size range, NMS with a narrow size distribution did not exhibit a very different distribution within the vasculature of the sheep kidney or uterus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18951045     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  2 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of callispheres microspheres in the porcine renal artery embolization model.

Authors:  Baosheng Ren; Wansheng Wang; Jian Shen; Caifang Ni; Xiaoli Zhu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Microfluidic-prepared, monodisperse, X-ray-visible, embolic microspheres for non-oncological embolization applications.

Authors:  Cyrus W Beh; Yingli Fu; Clifford R Weiss; Charles Hu; Aravind Arepally; Hai-Quan Mao; Tza-Huei Wang; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.799

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.