PURPOSE: To determine the optimum combination strategy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in an experimentally induced hepatic tumor model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five New Zealand White rabbits with VX2 carcinoma-induced hepatic tumors were randomly divided into five treatment groups, which received (i) chemoembolization followed 15 minutes later by RF ablation; (ii) RF ablation followed by chemoembolization; (iii) chemoembolization alone; (iv) RF ablation alone; and (v) bland embolization followed by RF ablation. Animals were euthanized at 48 hours to determine tumor infarction and coagulation, which were compared with analysis of variance. Representative histopathologic slides were compared. RESULTS: Significantly larger areas of coagulation were produced by chemoembolization followed by RF ablation (22.0 cm(3) +/- 7.7) compared with RF ablation followed by chemoembolization (13.1 cm(3) +/- 3.2) and RF ablation alone (10.0 cm(3) +/- 4.5; P < .05). RF ablation followed by chemoembolization showed larger treatment areas than chemoembolization alone (25.0 cm(3) +/- 9.6 vs 12.1 cm(3) +/- 4.6; P < .001), with chemotherapeutic agent preferentially depositing around the coagulation zone. Histopathologic analysis revealed greater vascular thrombosis and necrosis and reduced islands of viable tumor cells in the chemoembolization/RF ablation group versus the groups treated with chemoembolization alone or bland embolization/RF ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Larger treatment volumes were produced when chemoembolization was performed before RF ablation than when RF ablation preceded chemoembolization or when RF ablation or chemoembolization were performed alone. Larger treatment volumes were also produced when chemoembolization rather than bland embolization was performed before RF ablation, indicating the importance and synergy of the chemotherapeutic regimen. These results suggest that the reduction of tumor blood flow combined with the effect of hyperthermia and local chemotherapy creates the largest dimensions of treatment.
PURPOSE: To determine the optimum combination strategy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency (RF) ablation in an experimentally induced hepatic tumor model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five New Zealand White rabbits with VX2 carcinoma-induced hepatic tumors were randomly divided into five treatment groups, which received (i) chemoembolization followed 15 minutes later by RF ablation; (ii) RF ablation followed by chemoembolization; (iii) chemoembolization alone; (iv) RF ablation alone; and (v) bland embolization followed by RF ablation. Animals were euthanized at 48 hours to determine tumor infarction and coagulation, which were compared with analysis of variance. Representative histopathologic slides were compared. RESULTS: Significantly larger areas of coagulation were produced by chemoembolization followed by RF ablation (22.0 cm(3) +/- 7.7) compared with RF ablation followed by chemoembolization (13.1 cm(3) +/- 3.2) and RF ablation alone (10.0 cm(3) +/- 4.5; P < .05). RF ablation followed by chemoembolization showed larger treatment areas than chemoembolization alone (25.0 cm(3) +/- 9.6 vs 12.1 cm(3) +/- 4.6; P < .001), with chemotherapeutic agent preferentially depositing around the coagulation zone. Histopathologic analysis revealed greater vascular thrombosis and necrosis and reduced islands of viable tumor cells in the chemoembolization/RF ablation group versus the groups treated with chemoembolization alone or bland embolization/RF ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Larger treatment volumes were produced when chemoembolization was performed before RF ablation than when RF ablation preceded chemoembolization or when RF ablation or chemoembolization were performed alone. Larger treatment volumes were also produced when chemoembolization rather than bland embolization was performed before RF ablation, indicating the importance and synergy of the chemotherapeutic regimen. These results suggest that the reduction of tumor blood flow combined with the effect of hyperthermia and local chemotherapy creates the largest dimensions of treatment.
Authors: Aaron C Eifler; Robert J Lewandowski; Sumeet Virmani; Johnathan C Chung; Dingxin Wang; Richard L Tang; Barbara Szolc-Kowalska; Gayle E Woloschak; Guang-Yu Yang; Robert K Ryu; Riad Salem; Andrew C Larson; Eric Cheon; Matthew Strouch; David J Bentrem; Reed A Omary Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2009-06-28 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Hayden W Head; Gerald D Dodd; Ande Bao; Anuradha Soundararajan; Xavier Garcia-Rojas; Thomas J Prihoda; Linda M McManus; Beth A Goins; Cristina A Santoyo; William T Phillips Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Daniel Coman; Julius Chapiro; Lynn Jeanette Savic; Isabel Theresa Schobert; Dana Peters; John J Walsh; Fabian Max Laage-Gaupp; Charlie Alexander Hamm; Nina Tritz; Luzie A Doemel; MingDe Lin; Albert Sinusas; Todd Schlachter; James S Duncan; Fahmeed Hyder Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 12.531