Literature DB >> 18950443

Organizing health services for patients with chronic pain: when there is a will there is a way.

Patricia L Dobkin1, Lucy J Boothroyd.   

Abstract

SETTING: Due to its magnitude as a health problem, its associated burden, and the viability of modes of intervention, chronic pain (CP) should be considered a priority within health care systems. The lives of many patients with CP are devastated by this problem and health care professionals have a responsibility to assist them in reducing their suffering. Countries, regions, and systems differ considerably with regard to how they organize, administer, and finance services for CP patients.
OBJECTIVE: In this review, we highlight initiatives in three jurisdictions--France, Australia, and the Veterans' Health Administration in the United States--which demonstrate that when there is a will there is a way to change health care services for patients with CP. This work is a synopsis of a health technology assessment report we completed on behalf of the Quebec Health Services and Technology Assessment Agency (http://www.aetmis.gouv.qc.ca) at the request of the Ministry of Health and Social Services in Quebec, Canada, to inform policymakers at various levels of the health care system.
DESIGN: A literature search of published and unpublished "gray" literature was used to identify organizational themes according to structure, process, and outcome elements of health care services. For each theme, literature was reviewed in a qualitative manner; in addition, "real world" information was sought from example jurisdictions that have prioritized management of CP. Our conclusions point to key issues to consider when organizing health services for CP patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18950443     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00326.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  6 in total

1.  The prevalence of chronic pain in Canada.

Authors:  Donald Schopflocher; Paul Taenzer; Roman Jovey
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  A policy-into-practice intervention to increase the uptake of evidence-based management of low back pain in primary care: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Helen Slater; Stephanie Joy Davies; Richard Parsons; John Louis Quintner; Stephan Alexander Schug
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Knowledge Discovery from Posts in Online Health Communities Using Unified Medical Language System.

Authors:  Donghua Chen; Runtong Zhang; Kecheng Liu; Lei Hou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Perspective of Pain Clinicians in Three Global Cities on Local Barriers to Providing Care for Chronic Noncancer Pain Patients.

Authors:  S Fatima Lakha; Peri Ballantyne; Hanan Badr; Mubina Agboatwala; Angela Mailis; Peter Pennefather
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 5.  Pain in persons who are marginalized by social conditions.

Authors:  Kenneth D Craig; Cindy Holmes; Maria Hudspith; Gregg Moor; Mehmoona Moosa-Mitha; Colleen Varcoe; Bruce Wallace
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.926

6.  Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Diana Zidarov; Owis Eilayyan; Regina Visca
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.