Literature DB >> 18950033

Role of syrphid larvae and other predators in suppressing aphid infestations in organic lettuce on California's Central Coast.

Hugh A Smith1, William E Chaney, Tiffany A Bensen.   

Abstract

Organic lettuce, Lactuca sativa L., growers on the Central Coast of California rely on conservation biological control to manage Nasonovia ribisnigri Mosley (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and other aphid pests of lettuce. In 2006, we carried out five replicated field trials to determine the importance of syrphid larvae in the suppression of N. ribisnigri and other aphids infesting organic romaine lettuce. We used Entrust, a spinosad-based insecticide approved for use on organic farms, to suppress syrphid larvae in aphid-infested romaine. Romaine treated with Entrust was unmarketable at harvest because of aphid infestation, whereas insecticide-free romaine was marketable. Syrphid larvae composed 85% or more of total predators in most trials, and they were the only predators consistently recovered from romaine that was infested with aphids early and largely aphid-free by harvest. The species mix of nonsyrphid predators varied from site to site. Applications of Entrust suppressed nonsyrphid predators in two trials, and so was an imperfect tool for selectively suppressing syrphid larvae. The relative importance of syrphid larvae and other predators in the conservation biological control of aphids in organic romaine is discussed. We conclude that syrphid larvae are primarily responsible for the suppression of aphids in organic romaine on California's Central Coast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18950033     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[1526:roslao]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  A Differential Role of Volatiles from Conspecific and Heterospecific Competitors in the Selection of Oviposition Sites by the Aphidophagous Hoverfly Sphaerophoria rueppellii.

Authors:  Rocco Amorós-Jiménez; Christelle A M Robert; M Ángeles Marcos-García; Alberto Fereres; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Induced plant defences in biological control of arthropod pests: a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Maria L Pappas; Colette Broekgaarden; George D Broufas; Merijn R Kant; Gerben J Messelink; Anke Steppuhn; Felix Wäckers; Nicole M van Dam
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.845

3.  Contrasting Effects of Grass - Endophyte Chemotypes on a Tri-Trophic Cascade.

Authors:  Benjamin Fuchs; Eric Kuhnert; Jochen Krauss
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Bt crops benefit natural enemies to control non-target pests.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Ju Yao; Li-Ping Long; Jörg Romeis; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Role of the aphid species and their feeding locations in parasitization behavior of Aphelinus abdominalis, a parasitoid of the lettuce aphid Nasonovia ribisnigri.

Authors:  Govinda Shrestha; Henrik Skovgård; Gadi V P Reddy; Tove Steenberg; Annie Enkegaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.