Literature DB >> 18949747

Baseline urinary phytoestrogen levels and the natural history of untreated, localised prostate cancer in a British population.

R Venkitaraman1, K Thomas, P Grace, D Dearnaley, A Horwich, R Huddart, C C Parker.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether urinary concentrations of phytoestrogens are associated with the rate of disease progression in men with untreated, localised prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated, localised prostatic adenocarcinoma on a prospective clinical study of active surveillance had urine samples collected at baseline. Patients underwent monitoring with serial PSA levels and repeat octant prostate biopsies. Disease progression was defined as either adverse histology on repeat biopsy (primary Gleason grade >or= 4, or >50% positive cores) or radical treatment for PSA velocity >1 ng/mL/year. Time to disease progression was analysed with respect to baseline urinary levels of genistein, enterolactone, daidzein and equol, assayed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: 191 patients were evaluable, with a median follow-up of 2.5 years. 71 patients experienced disease progression. No significant association was seen between time to disease progression and baseline urinary levels of daidzein (p=0.85), genistein (p=0.81), enterolactone (p=0.085) or equol (p=0.33). No significant association was seen between adverse histology on repeat biopsy and urinary levels of either daidzein (p=0.85), genistein (p=0.58), enterolactone (p=0.88) or equol (p=0.71). There was no significant correlation between PSA velocity and urinary levels of daidzein (p=0.90), genistein (p=0.98), enterolactone (p=0.10) or equol (p=0.60).
CONCLUSION: These data do not support the hypothesis that phytoestrogens prevent disease progression in men with localised prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18949747     DOI: 10.1177/172460080802300310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   3.248


  3 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Clinical development of novel proteasome inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Huanjie Yang; Jeffrey A Zonder; Q Ping Dou
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.206

3.  Assessment of information to substantiate a health claim on the prevention of prostate cancer by lignans.

Authors:  Niina M Saarinen; Juhani Tuominen; Liisa Pylkkänen; Risto Santti
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.