Literature DB >> 18949458

Blockade of the acquisition, but not expression, of associative learning by pre-session intra-amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT.

Gavin D Phillips1, Paul K Hitchcott.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Two issues were addressed regarding the effects of amygdala dopamine manipulations on associative learning: first, an apparent contradiction between the effects of post- vs. pre-session dopaminergic manipulations and second, the ability of dopaminergic infusions to affect association formation vs. its expression following extended training.
OBJECTIVES: The ability of pre-session infusions of a dopamine receptor agonist (R(+) 7-OH-DPAT) to inhibit acquisition of a conditioned approach response was examined and compared with the same manipulation following overtraining. Further experiments extended these findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiment 1 infused pre-session intra-amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT (0, 0.1, 1 nmol) during conditioned approach acquisition. Experiment 2 applied pre-session intra-amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1 nmol) during expression of the same response, once well learned. Experiment 3 required the inhibition of a conditioned approach response following unconditioned stimulus (US) removal. Experiment 4 examined the ability of animals with prior drug experience to acquire a conditioned response to a novel stimulus.
RESULTS: Experiments 1-3 showed that pre-session amygdala R(+) 7-OH-DPAT impaired acquisition of either excitatory or inhibitory conditioned responding, but was ineffective following overtraining. Drug-induced impairments in acquisition of a specific conditioned stimulus (CS)-US relationship continued well beyond the cessation of drug treatment, but were found not to transfer to an alternate CS in Experiment 4.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-session dopamine receptor activation within the amygdala may impair the acquisition, but not expression, of CS-US associations. Enhanced learning reported earlier following post-session dopamine receptor activation may occur indirectly through reduced interference with the consolidation of recent learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18949458     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1382-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  54 in total

Review 1.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  A behavioral stages model of classical (Pavlovian) conditioning: application to cognitive aging.

Authors:  D A Powell
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The catecholaminergic innervation of the rat amygdala.

Authors:  E Asan
Journal:  Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.231

5.  Dopamine D1 or D2 receptor antagonism within the basolateral amygdala differentially alters the acquisition of cocaine-cue associations necessary for cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking.

Authors:  W J Berglind; J M Case; M P Parker; R A Fuchs; R E See
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Enduring resistance to extinction of cocaine-seeking behavior induced by drug-related cues.

Authors:  F Weiss; R Martin-Fardon; R Ciccocioppo; T M Kerr; D L Smith; O Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Isolation rearing-induced facilitation of Pavlovian learning: abolition by postsession intra-amygdala nafadotride.

Authors:  Gavin D Phillips; Catherine J Harmer; Paul K Hitchcott
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-08

Review 8.  The emergence of the volume transmission concept.

Authors:  M Zoli; C Torri; R Ferrari; A Jansson; I Zini; K Fuxe; L F Agnati
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-05

9.  Nucleus accumbens D2/3 receptors predict trait impulsivity and cocaine reinforcement.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Dalley; Tim D Fryer; Laurent Brichard; Emma S J Robinson; David E H Theobald; Kristjan Lääne; Yolanda Peña; Emily R Murphy; Yasmene Shah; Katrin Probst; Irina Abakumova; Franklin I Aigbirhio; Hugh K Richards; Young Hong; Jean-Claude Baron; Barry J Everitt; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  A role for mesencephalic dopamine in activation: commentary on Berridge (2006).

Authors:  T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  4 in total

1.  Role of the mesoamygdaloid dopamine projection in emotional learning.

Authors:  Gavin D Phillips; Emily Salussolia; Paul K Hitchcott
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Opposing roles of nucleus accumbens core and shell dopamine in the modulation of limbic information processing.

Authors:  Rutsuko Ito; Anja Hayen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Stimulation of dopamine D2/D3 but not D1 receptors in the central amygdala decreases cocaine-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Kenneth J Thiel; Jennifer M Wenzel; Nathan S Pentkowski; Rebecca J Hobbs; Andrea T Alleweireldt; Janet L Neisewander
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Serotonin at the level of the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex modulates distinct aspects of positive emotion in primates.

Authors:  Mei-See Man; Yevheniia Mikheenko; Katrin Braesicke; Gemma Cockcroft; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 5.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.