Literature DB >> 18949296

Cytotoxicity evaluation of four endodontic sealers.

Paulo Tadeu da Silva1, Fernanda Geraldes Pappen, Erick Miranda Souza, João Eduardo Dias, Idomeo Bonetti Filho, Iracilda Zepponi Carlos, Renato Toledo Leonardo.   

Abstract

This study evaluated in vitro the cytotoxicity of four root canal sealers (Topseal, EndoRez, TubliSeal and Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer E.W.T.) and their effects on reactive oxygen/nitrogen intermediate induction by mouse peritoneal macrophages. Thioglycollate-induced cells were obtained from Swiss mice by peritoneal lavage with 5 mL 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline, washed twice and resuspended (10(6) cells/mL) in appropriate medium for each test. Cytotoxicity was determined by the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO) by the peroxidase-dependent oxidation of phenol red and Griess reaction, respectively. Sealer suspensions were obtained in two different concentrations from each material: 18 mg/mL and 9 mg/mL, established according to compatibility parameters following MTT assay. Comparing the sealers, H2O2 release at concentrations of 9 mg/mL and 18 mg/mL was similar: Topseal > positive control (medium + cells + 5 mg/mL zimozan solution) > EndoRez > TubliSeal > Kerr Pulp E.W.T. > negative control (medium + cells). NO release at concentration of 9 mg/mL was: positive control (medium + cells + 10 microg/mL LPS solution) > Topseal > Kerr Pulp E.W.T. > TubliSeal = EndoRez > negative control (medium + cells); at concentration of 18 mg/mL was: positive control > Topseal > Kerr Pulp E.W.T > TubliSeal > EndoRez > negative control. Based on the results, it may be concluded that Topseal presented the highest cytotoxicity among the tested sealers, releasing higher concentrations of NO and H2O2 in macrophage culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18949296     DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000300010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  7 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of natural resin-based experimental endodontic sealers.

Authors:  Gleyce O Silva; Bruno N Cavalcanti; Tatiana R Oliveira; Claudia V Bin; Samira E A Camargo; Carlos H R Camargo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effects of aging on endotoxin tolerance induced by lipopolysaccharides derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Hui Li; Mi-Fang Yang; Wei Shu; Meng-Jun Sun; Yan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effect of nitric oxide inhibitor and donor substances on the inflammatory process caused by endodontic irrigants.

Authors:  Luciana Malheiro de Brito; Cláudia de Moura Carreira; Denise Pontes Raldi; José Luiz Lage-Marques; Sandra Márcia Habitante; Wilson Abraão Saad
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Chemosensitivity of MCF-7 cells to eugenol: release of cytochrome-c and lactate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Rana Al Wafai; Warde El-Rabih; Meghri Katerji; Remi Safi; Marwan El Sabban; Omar El-Rifai; Julnar Usta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Herbal Extracts Added to Root Canal Sealers of Different Bases: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Minarani T Devi; Sonali Saha; Abhay M Tripathi; Kavita Dhinsa; Sonali K Kalra; Ujjala Ghoshal
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

6.  Long-term cytotoxic effects of contemporary root canal sealers.

Authors:  Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da Silva; Carolina Carvalho Santos; Alexandre Augusto Zaia
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Cytotoxic evaluation of a new ceramic-based root canal sealer on human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sandra Chakar; Sylvie Changotade; Nada Osta; Issam Khalil
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.