Literature DB >> 18948806

The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results.

Wook Kim1, Kyo Young Song, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Sang Uk Han, Woo Jin Hyung, Gyu Seok Cho.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on the surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although laparoscopic gastrectomy is less invasive than conventional open surgery, surgeons are still concerned with surgical outcomes associated with comorbidity.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on 1324 patients who underwent LADG between April 1998 and December 2005 by 10 surgeons in 10 hospitals. After excluding 87 patients who had an unusual medical history or surgical methods, 1237 patients were enrolled for analysis to evaluate the effect of comorbidities on the surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: Seven patients (0.6%) died during their hospitalization, and postoperative complications occurred in 162 (13.1%) of 1237 patients. According to univariate analysis, gender, number of comorbidities, reconstruction type, and the surgeon's experience in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) were related to postoperative local complications; age and comorbidity were related to systemic complications; and comorbidity was the only variable related to hospital mortality. Comorbidity was a predictive risk factor for local complications (odds ratio (OR): 1.79) and systemic complications (OR: 2.89) in multivariate analysis. The patients with pulmonary comorbidity were related to most types of immediate postoperative complications compared with other comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that comorbidities of patients could be a predictive risk factor for surgical complication after LADG. Therefore, patients with early gastric cancer having comorbidity should be considered for one of the limited surgeries. In addition, surgeons should carefully assess patients with comorbidities with full perioperative attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18948806     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181887516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  72 in total

1.  Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a monoinstitutional Western center experience.

Authors:  Elena Orsenigo; Saverio Di Palo; Andrea Tamburini; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The impact of abdominal shape index of patients on laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyasu Ojima; Makoto Iwahashi; Mikihito Nakamori; Masaki Nakamura; Katsunari Takifuji; Masahiro Katsuda; Takeshi Iida; Toshiaki Tsuji; Keiji Hayata; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Prealbumin levels as a useful marker for predicting infectious complications after gastric surgery.

Authors:  Hye-Jung Bae; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Dong-Seok Han; Yun-Suhk Suh; Yong-Hwa Lee; Hye-Suk Lee; Jae-Jin Cho; Seong-Ho Kong; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system.

Authors:  Mi Ran Jung; Young Kyu Park; Jang Won Seon; Kwang Yong Kim; Oh Cheong; Seong Yeob Ryu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios H Roukos; Christos Katsios
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Role of Percutaneous Glue Treatment After Persisting Leak After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ramon Vilallonga; Jacques Himpens; Barbara Bosch; Simon van de Vrande; Johan Bafort
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Comparison of early-term effects between totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis and conventional laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Jian-Cheng Tu; Jian Fang; Liang Zhou; Ye-Lu Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

8.  A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Oncological, Cost, and Surgical Stress Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Risk factors for postoperative complications after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with comorbidities.

Authors:  Takuya Hamakawa; Yukinori Kurokawa; Jota Mikami; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Complications and Resource Use Associated With Surgery for Chiari Malformation Type 1 in Adults: A Population Perspective.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Travis R Ladner; Margaret A Olsen; Chevis N Shannon; Jingxia Liu; Chester K Yarbrough; Jay F Piccirillo; John C Wellons; Matthew D Smyth; Tae Sung Park; David D Limbrick
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.