Literature DB >> 18948485

Estimated occupational risk from bioaerosols generated during land application of class B biosolids.

Benjamin D Tanner1, John P Brooks, Charles P Gerba, Charles N Haas, Karen L Josephson, Ian L Pepper.   

Abstract

Some speculate that bioaerosols from land application of biosolids pose occupational risks, but few studies have assessed aerosolization of microorganisms from biosolids or estimated occupational risks of infection. This study investigated levels of microorganisms in air immediately downwind of land application operations and estimated occupational risks from aerosolized microorganisms. In all, more than 300 air samples were collected downwind of biosolids application sites at various locations within the United States. Coliform bacteria, coliphages, and heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria were enumerated from air and biosolids at each site. Concentrations of coliforms relative to Salmonella and concentrations of coliphage relative to enteroviruses in biosolids were used, in conjunction with levels of coliforms and coliphages measured in air during this study, to estimate exposure to Salmonella and enteroviruses in air. The HPC bacteria were ubiquitous in air near land application sites whether or not biosolids were being applied, and concentrations were positively correlated to windspeed. Coliform bacteria were detected only when biosolids were being applied to land or loaded into land applicators. Coliphages were detected in few air samples, and only when biosolids were being loaded into land applicators. In general, environmental parameters had little impact on concentrations of microorganisms in air immediately downwind of land application. The method of land application was most correlated to aerosolization. From this large body of data, the occupational risk of infection from bioaerosols was estimated to be 0.78 to 2.1%/yr. Extraordinary exposure scenarios carried an estimated annual risk of infection of up to 34%, with viruses posing the greatest threat. Risks from aerosolized microorganisms at biosolids land application sites appear to be lower than those at wastewater treatment plants, based on previously reported literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18948485     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  6 in total

1.  EU policy on sewage sludge utilization and perspectives on new approaches of sludge management.

Authors:  G Mininni; A R Blanch; F Lucena; S Berselli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of Methods to Identify Pathogens and Associated Virulence Functional Genes in Biosolids from Two Different Wastewater Treatment Facilities in Canada.

Authors:  Etienne Yergeau; Luke Masson; Miria Elias; Shurong Xiang; Ewa Madey; Hongsheng Huang; Brian Brooks; Lee A Beaudette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 4.  BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: fate and transport of bioaerosols associated with livestock operations and manures.

Authors:  R S Dungan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Spray Irrigation of Dairy Manure Based on an Empirical Fate and Transport Model.

Authors:  Tucker R Burch; Susan K Spencer; Joel P Stokdyk; Burney A Kieke; Rebecca A Larson; Aaron D Firnstahl; Ana M Rule; Mark A Borchardt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Workers Exposed to Bioaerosol in Wastewater Treatment Plants Aimed at the Choice and Setup of Safety Measures.

Authors:  Annalaura Carducci; Gabriele Donzelli; Lorenzo Cioni; Ileana Federigi; Roberto Lombardi; Marco Verani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.