BACKGROUND: When patients return to the emergency department (ED) shortly after being seen, it is generally assumed that their initial evaluation or treatment was inadequate. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the rates and causes of revisits to the ED of a 710-bed secondary teaching referral hospital (Kuang Tien General Hospital), to identify areas for improvement, and to define the initial ED presentations that are associated with such revisits. METHODS: The study period was from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. There were 34,714 patients seen and discharged in the ED; 1899 patients returned within 72 h. Monthly revisit rates were calculated. The patients who revisited the ED within 72 h were retrospectively identified by the authors, and their charts were examined to determine the causes of the revisits. RESULTS: There were 1899 patients (5.47% of total) found to have revisited the ED within 72 h after their initial visit. The monthly revisit rates ranged from 2.85% to 6.25% (average, 5.47%). The rates of revisits that were related to factors of illness, patients, and doctors were 80.9%, 10.9%, and 8.2%, respectively. Among the factors related to doctors, 3.7% (70 cases) were misdiagnosis, and abdominal pain was the most common presentation (55.7%, 39/70). The most common initial ED presentations were for abdominal pain (12.9%), fever (12.6%), vertigo (4.5%), headache (2.1), and upper respiratory infection (2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned ED revisits are associated with medical errors in prognosis, treatment, follow-up care, and information. Differentiation between the natural course of a disease, suboptimal therapy, over-anxious reaction of the patient, and medical errors is difficult. Although this study indicates that most revisits are illness-related, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the most common and the most serious causes of revisits to see if improvements can be made. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: When patients return to the emergency department (ED) shortly after being seen, it is generally assumed that their initial evaluation or treatment was inadequate. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the rates and causes of revisits to the ED of a 710-bed secondary teaching referral hospital (Kuang Tien General Hospital), to identify areas for improvement, and to define the initial ED presentations that are associated with such revisits. METHODS: The study period was from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. There were 34,714 patients seen and discharged in the ED; 1899 patients returned within 72 h. Monthly revisit rates were calculated. The patients who revisited the ED within 72 h were retrospectively identified by the authors, and their charts were examined to determine the causes of the revisits. RESULTS: There were 1899 patients (5.47% of total) found to have revisited the ED within 72 h after their initial visit. The monthly revisit rates ranged from 2.85% to 6.25% (average, 5.47%). The rates of revisits that were related to factors of illness, patients, and doctors were 80.9%, 10.9%, and 8.2%, respectively. Among the factors related to doctors, 3.7% (70 cases) were misdiagnosis, and abdominal pain was the most common presentation (55.7%, 39/70). The most common initial ED presentations were for abdominal pain (12.9%), fever (12.6%), vertigo (4.5%), headache (2.1), and upper respiratory infection (2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned ED revisits are associated with medical errors in prognosis, treatment, follow-up care, and information. Differentiation between the natural course of a disease, suboptimal therapy, over-anxious reaction of the patient, and medical errors is difficult. Although this study indicates that most revisits are illness-related, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the most common and the most serious causes of revisits to see if improvements can be made. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Amy Hui Sian Chan; Shu Fang Ho; Stephanie Man Chung Fook-Chong; Sherman Wei Qiang Lian; Nan Liu; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Keith Flower; Anneke Post; Jeremy Sussman; Niels Tangherlini; John Mendelson; Mark J Pletcher Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Kristin L Rising; David N Karp; Rhea E Powell; Timothy W Victor; Brendan G Carr Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Abdullah Cüneyt Hocagil; Fikret Bildik; İsa Kılıçaslan; Hilal Hocagil; Hasan Karabulut; Ayfer Keleş; Ahmet Demircan Journal: Balkan Med J Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 2.021
Authors: Gianfranco Cervellin; Riccardo Mora; Andrea Ticinesi; Tiziana Meschi; Ivan Comelli; Fausto Catena; Giuseppe Lippi Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2016-10
Authors: Gelareh Z Gabayan; Steven M Asch; Renee Y Hsia; David Zingmond; Li-Jung Liang; Weijuan Han; Heather McCreath; Robert E Weiss; Benjamin C Sun Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.721