Arne Stenberg1, Göran Läckgren. 1. Section of Urology, University Children's Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. arne.stenberg@surgsci.uu.se
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) can be treated with open surgery, antibiotic therapy or endoscopic injection. A goal in children is to reduce the incidence of febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs). The present long-term observational study investigated outcomes and experiences of endoscopic treatment with stabilized non-animal hyaluronic acid/dextranomer, NASHA/Dx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children treated with NASHA/Dx between 1993 and 1998 were sent a questionnaire by mail in 2005. Patients included in the study (n=231) had VUR grade III-V before treatment and grade 0-II afterwards. Patients completed 21 questions, with parental assistance if required. The questionnaire assessed clinical outcome, and the attitudes of both patients and their parents to their experiences of treatment with NASHA/Dx gel. Patients reporting UTI after treatment were contacted and their records analyzed. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 179 eligible patients. Most (72%) received a single injection of NASHA/Dx gel, and all experienced febrile UTI before treatment. After treatment, 45 patients (25%) experienced UTI; 25 of these reported fever. Patient records and telephone interviews revealed no evidence of febrile UTI in 19 cases; febrile UTI was confirmed in six cases, an incidence of 3.4%. When asked about the worst aspect of VUR treatment, 9% indicated treatment with NASHA/Dx compared to 19% for medication and 72% for voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG); parent-rated responses were 19%, 24% and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment with NASHA/Dx gel was associated with a low number of febrile UTIs following treatment, viewed positively and considered less bothersome than medication or VCUG. These findings support this treatment as a primary intervention for VUR.
OBJECTIVE: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) can be treated with open surgery, antibiotic therapy or endoscopic injection. A goal in children is to reduce the incidence of febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs). The present long-term observational study investigated outcomes and experiences of endoscopic treatment with stabilized non-animal hyaluronic acid/dextranomer, NASHA/Dx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children treated with NASHA/Dx between 1993 and 1998 were sent a questionnaire by mail in 2005. Patients included in the study (n=231) had VUR grade III-V before treatment and grade 0-II afterwards. Patients completed 21 questions, with parental assistance if required. The questionnaire assessed clinical outcome, and the attitudes of both patients and their parents to their experiences of treatment with NASHA/Dx gel. Patients reporting UTI after treatment were contacted and their records analyzed. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 179 eligible patients. Most (72%) received a single injection of NASHA/Dx gel, and all experienced febrile UTI before treatment. After treatment, 45 patients (25%) experienced UTI; 25 of these reported fever. Patient records and telephone interviews revealed no evidence of febrile UTI in 19 cases; febrile UTI was confirmed in six cases, an incidence of 3.4%. When asked about the worst aspect of VUR treatment, 9% indicated treatment with NASHA/Dx compared to 19% for medication and 72% for voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG); parent-rated responses were 19%, 24% and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment with NASHA/Dx gel was associated with a low number of febrile UTIs following treatment, viewed positively and considered less bothersome than medication or VCUG. These findings support this treatment as a primary intervention for VUR.