Literature DB >> 1894745

Marking width, calibration from tip and tine diameter of periodontal probes.

E Van der Zee1, E H Davies, H N Newman.   

Abstract

The present study comprises an investigation of 7 different probe types, representing currently-marketed major designs (WHO-CPITN, Williams, Michigan), as well as available calibration systems (engraved, etched and painted markings). Width of markings, accuracy of calibration from probe tip, and tine diameter at the tip and at specified points along the tine were assessed, using a stereomicroscope at a magnification of x 40. Blind duplicate measurements of these probe tine characteristics were 100% reproducible to within 0.01 mm. There was an overall range in marking width from 0.00-1.13 mm. The best marking, in that it had no appreciable width and the highest accuracy, was the discrete transition between normal and engraved parts of probes with engraved bands. Mean inaccuracies of different probe sets varied from 0.06 to 0.22 mm. Probes from the same batch from the same production line could differ by more than 0.5 mm in calibration. Mean tip diameter ranged from 0.28 to 0.70 mm. It was concluded that probe tine diameter and calibration should be considered in addition to other variables of periodontal probing. Standardisation of tine characteristics and avoidance of the use of different types or batches in a single study should enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of periodontal probe-dependent measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1894745     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb00083.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a personalized device in the evaluation of mandibular second molar periodontal healing after surgical extraction of adjacent third molar.

Authors:  Roberto Pippi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-02-04

2.  Standards for reporting chronic periodontitis prevalence and severity in epidemiologic studies: Proposed standards from the Joint EU/USA Periodontal Epidemiology Working Group.

Authors:  Birte Holtfreter; Jasim M Albandar; Thomas Dietrich; Bruce A Dye; Kenneth A Eaton; Paul I Eke; Panos N Papapanou; Thomas Kocher
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 3.  Methodological issues in epidemiological studies of periodontitis--how can it be improved?

Authors:  Roos Leroy; Kenneth A Eaton; Amir Savage
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Effects of different manual periodontal probes on periodontal measurements.

Authors:  Birte Holtfreter; Dietrich Alte; Christian Schwahn; Moïse Desvarieux; Thomas Kocher
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 8.728

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.