Literature DB >> 18947118

Adverse events during hospitalization: results of a patient survey.

Floyd J Fowler1, Arnold Epstein, Saul N Weingart, Catherine L Annas, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Brian Clarridge, Eric C Schneider, Joel S Weissman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A two-stage probability sample of patients recently discharged from 16 general acute care hospitals in Massachusetts were interviewed to determine the rates at which patients experience what they considered to be adverse events, to describe the kinds of events they reported, and to identify the correlates of those reports.
METHODS: Eligible respondents were adults, 18 years of age or older, who were medical or surgical patients overnight or longer between April 1 and October 1, 2003, and who were discharged to their homes in Massachusetts. Questions covered perceptions of adverse events during hospitalizations and possible correlates of those events. Telephone interviews were carried out an average of nine months after discharge with 2,582 patients (response rate, 53%-60%).
RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of respondents reported at least one unexpected "negative" event during their hospitalization. After physician review, the revised estimate was that 25% perceived that they had experienced at least one event that met our definition for an adverse event. The most common reported events were reactions to newly prescribed drugs (40%) and the effects of surgery (34%). Physician reviewers coded 57% of the adverse events as "significant" and 18% as "serious" or "life-threatening." The physician reviewers also rated 31% of the reported adverse events as likely to be preventable. DISCUSSION: The estimate that one in four hospital patients experienced an adverse event is considerably higher than the published rates based on hospital record review, indicating the potential value of surveys for studies of patient safety. Because of nonresponse among older patients, that estimate is probably an underestimate. Designs that would reduce lags between discharge and interviews and decrease hospital nonresponses would reduce two key threats to confidence in the survey results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18947118     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34073-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  7 in total

1.  Risk factors for patient-reported medical errors in eleven countries.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Putting the 'patient' in patient safety: a qualitative study of consumer experiences.

Authors:  Cheryl Rathert; Julie Brandt; Eric S Williams
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Hospitalized patients' participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Junya Zhu; Laurel Chiappetta; Sherri O Stuver; Eric C Schneider; Arnold M Epstein; Jo Ann David-Kasdan; Catherine L Annas; Floyd J Fowler; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Patients as Partners in Learning from Unexpected Events.

Authors:  Jason M Etchegaray; Madelene J Ottosen; Aitebureme Aigbe; Emily Sedlock; William M Sage; Sigall K Bell; Thomas H Gallagher; Eric J Thomas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Development of a Quality Improvement Dental Chart Review Training Program.

Authors:  Elsbeth Kalenderian; Nutan B Hebballi; Amy Franklin; Alfa Yansane; Ana M Ibarra Noriega; Joel White; Muhammad F Walji
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.243

6.  Adverse Events in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Long-Term Biological Agents in a Real-Life Setting.

Authors:  Mayara Costa de Camargo; Bruna Cipriano Almeida Barros; Izabela Fulone; Marcus Tolentino Silva; Miriam Sanches do Nascimento Silveira; Iara Alves de Camargo; Silvio Barberato-Filho; Fernando de Sá Del Fiol; Luciane Cruz Lopes
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  The patient is in: patient involvement strategies for diagnostic error mitigation.

Authors:  Kathryn M McDonald; Cindy L Bryce; Mark L Graber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 7.035

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.