Literature DB >> 18946953

The perception of health care risk: patients, health care staff and society.

Umberto Fiandra1, Ida Marina Raciti, Roberto Mosso, Giuseppe Calipari, Marco Rapellino.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Nuovo Zingarelli, dictionary of the Italian language, defines risk as "the possibility of harmful or negative consequences following not always predictable circumstances". A statistical-epidemiological type of definition is far removed from the social and psychological conception that the population attributes to the risk of harm, which is related to interior processes and emotional reactions. Information on risks interacts with knowledge, personal values and beliefs to produce a subjective expression that is perception.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two years after instituting the Hospital Quality and Risk Management Unit at S. Giovanni Battista Molinette Hospital (Turin, Italy) it became clear that it was necessary to determine the perception of health care risk among nursing staff. Therefore, nursing teams from eight sub-departmental units in six departments were invited to participate in an assessment project.
RESULTS: The project was undertaken by four nursing teams composed of four head nurses (project representatives) and 45 professional nurses. The aims of the project were understood by all four groups; three participated with interest, one only in part. Three groups considered that it would be useful to continue the project, while the other group did not discuss this point.
CONCLUSIONS: The project on the perception of health care risk by nursing staff revealed that mistaken identification of the patient, errors during the administration of treatment and poor communication among colleagues and with doctors and patients were the risks of error perceived as most important by nurses. Heavy work loads, staff shortages, technical and structural problems, and gaps in professional knowledge were identified as the factors related to the occurrence of adverse events. These data differed from management's perception because no incident report forms had ever been received from these nursing teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946953      PMCID: PMC2626843          DOI: 10.2450/2008.0045-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   3.443


  12 in total

1.  Current perceived risks of transfusion in the UK and relevance to the future acceptance of blood substitutes.

Authors:  K C Lowe; K Farrell; E M Ferguson; V James
Journal:  Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol       Date:  2001-05

2.  What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; David W Bates; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Perceived safety of donor blood and blood substitutes for transfusion: the role of informational frame, patient groups and stress appraisals.

Authors:  E Ferguson; J Leaviss; E Townsend; P Fleming; K C Lowe
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.019

4.  Confidence in the safety of blood for transfusion: the effect of message framing.

Authors:  K Farrell; E Ferguson; V James; K C Lowe
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Patient-reported service quality on a medicine unit.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips; David W Bates
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  Patient concerns about medical errors in emergency departments.

Authors:  Thomas E Burroughs; Amy D Waterman; Thomas H Gallagher; Brian Waterman; David Adams; Donna B Jeffe; William Claiborne Dunagan; Jane Garbutt; Max M Cohen; Jane Cira; Joe Inguanzo; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients.

Authors:  S N Weingart; A N Ship; M D Aronson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Describing treatment effects to patients.

Authors:  Annette Moxey; Dianne O'Connell; Patricia McGettigan; David Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Patients' concerns about medical errors during hospitalization.

Authors:  Thomas E Burroughs; Amy D Waterman; Thomas H Gallagher; Brian Waterman; Donna B Jeffe; William Claiborne Dunagan; Jane Garbutt; Max M Cohen; Jane Cira; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-01

10.  Predictors of emergency department patient satisfaction: stability over 17 months.

Authors:  Edwin D Boudreaux; Sarah D'Autremont; Karen Wood; Glenn N Jones
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  1 in total

1.  What is the perception of biological risk by undergraduate nursing students?

Authors:  M Carmen Moreno-Arroyo; Montserrat Puig-Llobet; Anna Falco-Pegueroles; Maria Teresa Lluch-Canut; Irma Casas García; Juan Roldán-Merino
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-07-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.