Literature DB >> 18946344

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma without preoperative tumor biopsy.

Philippe Compagnon1, Stéphane Grandadam, Richard Lorho, Bruno Turlin, Christophe Camus, Yang Jianrong, Fabrice Lainé, Bernard Meunier, Yves Deugnier, Karim Boudjema.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progress in liver imaging has made pretransplantation tumor biopsy no longer systematic in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of a preoperative diagnosis of HCC based on clinical and radiological findings in 102 cirrhotics qualified for liver transplantation (LT) between January 1995 and August 2003 at our institution.
METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of our policy was assessed by comparing pretransplant diagnosis with the pathologic report of explanted livers.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for the preoperative clinical and radiological diagnosis of HCC were 89%, 94.3%, 77%, and 93.3%, respectively. A false-positive preoperative diagnosis was made in 20 of 102 patients (19.6%) (dysplastic nodules [n=9], regenerative nodules [n=5] cholangiocellular carcinoma [n=1], hemangioma [n=1], and no lesion [n=4]). All tumors larger than 3 cm were correctly diagnosed, irrespective of serum alpha-fetoprotein (sAFP) levels. The risk of overestimating the diagnosis of HCC in the subgroup of patients with tumors less than 3 cm was conversely correlated with preliver transplantation sAFP (sAFP<or=100 ng/L: 28%; sAFP>100: 11%; sAFP>200: 0%).
CONCLUSION: In cirrhotics with nodules larger than 3 cm irrespective of sAFP or nodules less than 3 cm with sAFP greater than 200 ng/L, the pretransplant diagnosis of HCC can be made without performing biopsy. In other cases (i.e., nodules less than 3 cm and sAFP lower than 200 ng/L), histologic confirmation of HCC or a close follow-up imaging should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946344     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318187754c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  LI-RADS and transplantation: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Guilherme M Cunha; Dorathy E Tamayo-Murillo; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-01

2.  A diagnostic paradigm for resectable liver lesions: to biopsy or not to biopsy?

Authors:  Adrian B Cresswell; Fenella K S Welsh; Myrddin Rees
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Agostino Colli; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Cristina Manzotti; Davor Štimac; Damir Miletic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Liver Transplantation for HCC: A Review.

Authors:  Rahul Kakodkar; A S Soin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Michael T Corwin; Irene Cruite; Christoph F Dietrich; Richard K G Do; Eric C Ehman; Kathryn J Fowler; Hero K Hussain; Reena C Jha; Adib R Karam; Adrija Mamidipalli; Robert M Marks; Donald G Mitchell; Tara A Morgan; Michael A Ohliger; Amol Shah; Kim-Nhien Vu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Kathryn J Fowler; Aya Kamaya; Ania Z Kielar; Khaled M Elsayes; Mustafa R Bashir; Yuko Kono; Richard K Do; Donald G Mitchell; Amit G Singal; An Tang; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.