Literature DB >> 1894563

National beef tenderness survey.

J B Morgan1, J W Savell, D S Hale, R K Miller, D B Griffin, H R Cross, S D Shackelford.   

Abstract

To determine the average tenderness and sensory ratings of beef subprimal cuts sold in retail cases across the United States, retail cuts were purchased through typical retail outlets in 14 metropolitan cities and transported to Texas A&M University for sensory and Warner-Bratzler shear analysis. The overall mean shear force for all cuts was 3.65 kg, and the mean shear force values for chuck, rib, loin, and round cuts were 3.72, 3.36, 3.17, and 4.31 kg, respectively. No difference (P greater than .05) in tenderness was detected among the cuts from the rib. Mean palatability ratings and shear force values of top loin steaks were similar to those of rib cuts. Top sirloin steaks were tougher (P less than .05) and received the lowest sensory ratings compared with other loin cuts. Approximately two to three times as many round and chuck steaks had shear force values in excess of 4.6 kg compared with their roast counterparts. In all cases, roasts tended to be more tender than steaks from the same subprimal source. USDA Choice chuck retail cuts, compared to Select and No-roll chuck cuts, had approximately 10% fewer cuts with shear force values in excess of 4.0 kg. More work is needed to improve meat tenderness, primarily for retail cuts from the round and chuck primals. Future research must investigate the interaction of antemortem and postmortem factors associated with variation in beef tenderness.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1894563     DOI: 10.2527/1991.6983274x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Effects of aging and freezing/thawing sequence on quality attributes of bovine Mm. gluteus medius and biceps femoris.

Authors:  Hyun-Wook Kim; Yuan H Brad Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.509

2.  United States beef quality as chronicled by the National Beef Quality Audits, Beef Consumer Satisfaction Projects, and National Beef Tenderness Surveys - A review.

Authors:  John Michael Gonzalez; Kelsey Jean Phelps
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Influence of Grain- and Grass-Finishing Systems on Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, Nutritional Composition, and Consumer Sensory Attributes of Bison.

Authors:  Jessica Janssen; Kristi Cammack; Jerrad Legako; Ryan Cox; J Kyle Grubbs; Keith Underwood; John Hansen; Carter Kruse; Amanda Blair
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-12

4.  Cluster analysis application identifies muscle characteristics of importance for beef tenderness.

Authors:  Sghaier Chriki; Graham E Gardner; Catherine Jurie; Brigitte Picard; Didier Micol; Jean-Paul Brun; Laurent Journaux; Jean-Francois Hocquette
Journal:  BMC Biochem       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.059

5.  Effect of Proteolytic Enzymes and Ginger Extract on Tenderization of M. pectoralis profundus from Holstein Steer.

Authors:  Sung Sil Moon
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.622

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.