Literature DB >> 18945594

Safety and tolerability of ertapenem versus ceftriaxone in a double-blind study performed in children with complicated urinary tract infection, community-acquired pneumonia or skin and soft-tissue infection.

Adriano Arguedas1, Jaime Cespedes, Francesc Aseni Botet, Jeffrey Blumer, Ram Yogev, Richard Gesser, Jean Wang, Joseph West, Theresa Snyder, Wendy Wimmer.   

Abstract

The carbapenem antibiotic ertapenem has been shown to be safe, well tolerated and effective in treating adults with complicated urinary tract infection, skin and soft-tissue infection and community-acquired pneumonia. In this study, we evaluated ertapenem for treating these infections in children in a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinical and laboratory drug-related serious adverse events (AEs). Children were randomised in a 3:1 ratio (ertapenem:ceftriaxone) stratified by index infection and age to receive ertapenem or ceftriaxone; 303 children received ertapenem and 100 children received ceftriaxone. The median duration of parenteral therapy was 4 days for both treatments. The most commonly reported drug-related clinical AEs during parenteral therapy were diarrhoea (5.9% ertapenem, 10% ceftriaxone), infusion site erythema (3% ertapenem, 2% ceftriaxone) and infusion site pain (5% ertapenem, 1% ceftriaxone). One child in each group reported a serious drug-related clinical AE. No serious drug-related laboratory AEs were reported. In children aged 3 months to 17 years, ertapenem was well tolerated and had a comparable safety profile to that of ceftriaxone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18945594     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  6 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single-dose intravenous ertapenem in infants, children, and adolescents.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Gregory L Kearns; Santiago Topelberg; Richard F Jacobs; Goutam C Mistry; Anup Majumdar; Yang Xu; John A Wagner; Chester J Kitchen; Michelle Groff; Gary Herman; Jeffrey L Blumer
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  In vitro activity of ertapenem versus ceftriaxone against Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with highly diverse ceftriaxone MIC values and effects of ceftriaxone resistance determinants: ertapenem for treatment of gonorrhea?

Authors:  Magnus Unemo; Daniel Golparian; Athena Limnios; David Whiley; Makoto Ohnishi; Monica M Lahra; John W Tapsall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Evaluating Safety Reporting in Paediatric Antibiotic Trials, 2000-2016: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paola Pansa; Yingfen Hsia; Julia Bielicki; Irja Lutsar; A Sarah Walker; Mike Sharland; Laura Folgori
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Effective antimicrobial therapies of urinary tract infection among children in low-income and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rifat Ara; Sarker Mohammad Nasrullah; Zarrin Tasnim; Sadia Afrin; K M Saif-Ur-Rahman; Mohammad Delwer Hossain Hawlader
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  In Vitro Activity of Ertapenem against Neisseria gonorrhoeae Clinical Isolates with Decreased Susceptibility or Resistance to Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporins in Nanjing, China (2013 to 2019).

Authors:  Xuechun Li; Wenjing Le; Xiangdi Lou; Caroline A Genco; Peter A Rice; Xiaohong Su
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.938

6.  Safety of ceftriaxone in paediatrics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linan Zeng; Chao Wang; Min Jiang; Kexin Chen; Haiqin Zhong; Zhe Chen; Liang Huang; Hailong Li; Lingli Zhang; Imti Choonara
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.791

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.