Literature DB >> 18945580

Atherosclerotic aortic lesions increase the risk of cerebral embolism during carotid stenting in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy.

Gianluca Faggioli1, Monica Ferri, Claudio Rapezzi, Caterina Tonon, Lamberto Manzoli, Andrea Stella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) leads to frequent embolic brain lesions; their source has not been clearly identified yet. In order to investigate this phenomenon, we have evaluated embolic brain lesions (BL) after CAS and correlated them with aortic arch (AA) characteristics.
METHODS: The AAs of 59 patients undergoing CAS under distal protection were evaluated by angiography and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). AAs were stratified according to morphology (type I and II "simple" vs type III and bovine "difficult"), atherosclerotic arch lesions (complicated: >5 mm or with mobile debris vs uncomplicated: <5 mm), and tortuosity index (TI; sum of all angles diverging from ideal carotid axis, <150 vs >150). Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) was performed before and within 24 hours from CAS. New BL were considered ipsilateral (IL) if ipsilateral to the site of CAS and non-ipsilateral (CL) if contralateral to it or bilateral. Normality distribution was by Shapiro-Wilk test (variables reported as medians +/- interquartile range) and statistical significance (P < .05) by Wilcoxon and Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Difficult arches were present in 17 patients (28.8%), complicated aortic plaque in 21 (35.5%), and TI > 150 in 34 (57.6%). New BL appeared in 34 or 57.6% patients (6 or 18% IL and 28 or 82% CL). The mean number of BL was 5.7 (range, 0 to 20), 4.7 IL, and 5.7 CL, with a median volume of 560.95 +/- 1677.7 mm(3). Type of arch and TI were not correlated with mean number of BL. Mean volume of BL were greater in patients with difficult AA, complicated plaques, and TI > 150 (258 (572) mm(3) vs 15.6 (353) mm(3), P = .2; and 86 (828) mm(3) vs 85.9 (352) mm(3), P = .4 172 (766) mm(3) vs 0 (228) mm(3), P = .06, respectively). In patients with all three AA characteristics, mean number and volume of BL was significantly greater compared with other patients. Specifically, this increase was due mainly to CL (IL 0 (117) mm(3) vs 0 (172) mm(3), P = .9; CL 564 (687) mm(3) vs 0 (133) mm(3), P = .001). None of the technical details considered was correlated with either IL or CL.
CONCLUSION: BL are frequent after protected CAS and are correlated with AA characteristics, thus underlining the role of catheterization maneuvers in determining embolic events. TEE may be useful in patient's selection for CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18945580     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  16 in total

1.  Letter to the editor re: "Carotid stenting through the right brachial approach for left internal carotid artery stenosis and bovine aortic arch configuration".

Authors:  Netanel S Berko; Linda B Haramati
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Anatomical risk factors for ischemic lesions associated with carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Go Ikeda; Wataro Tsuruta; Yasunobu Nakai; Masanari Shiigai; Aiki Marushima; Tomohiko Masumoto; Hideo Tsurushima; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Transcervical access via direct neck exposure for neurointerventional procedures in the hybrid angiosuite.

Authors:  Jong Young Lee; Jong-Hwa Park; Hong Jun Jeon; Dae Young Yoon; Seoung Woo Park; Byung Moon Cho
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Novel triple coaxial system to navigate 9 French balloon guiding catheter into common carotid artery.

Authors:  Ryuta Yasuda; Naoki Toma; Yume Suzuki; Yoichi Miura; Masato Shiba; Hidenori Suzuki
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Factors Associated with Increased Rates of Post-procedural Stroke or Death following Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muhib Khan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-05

Review 6.  Insight into the periprocedural embolic events of internal carotid artery angioplasty. A report of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  L Jiang; F Ling; B Wang; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  Availability of tracheal shift in the chest X-ray image as pre-treatment evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy.

Authors:  Fukutaro Ohgaki; Nobuyuki Shimizu; Jun Suenaga; Kensuke Tateishi; Naoki Ikegaya; Ryosuke Suzuki; Koji Yamamura; Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2022-05-17

8.  Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Traenka; Stefan T Engelter; Martin M Brown; Joanna Dobson; Chris Frost; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-01-15

9.  Distal radial artery (snuffbox) access for carotid artery stenting - Technical pearls and procedural set-up.

Authors:  Anna Luisa Kühn; Jasmeet Singh; Viraj M Moholkar; Sudhakar R Satti; Katyucia de Macedo Rodrigues; Francesco Massari; Matthew J Gounis; Archie McGowan; Ajit S Puri
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  A Protocol-Based Decision for Choosing a Proper Surgical Treatment Option for Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  E-Wook Jang; Joonho Chung; Kwon-Duk Seo; Sang Hyun Suh; Yong Bae Kim; Kyung-Yul Lee
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.