BACKGROUND: Memory impairment is being recognized increasingly as an important feature of the neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Dysfunction of working memory, a system for the short-term storage and manipulation of information, may relate to a number of core symptoms of schizophrenia. Many studies have examined working memory function in schizophrenia but a clear understanding of the nature and extent of any deficit has been elusive. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing working memory function in subjects with schizophrenia and healthy controls was performed. Following a comprehensive literature search, meta-analyses were conducted on 36 measures of phonological, visuospatial and central executive working memory functioning, encompassing 441 separate results from 187 different studies. RESULTS: Statistically significant effect sizes were found for all working memory measures, indicating deficits in schizophrenia groups. Some of these were robust findings in the absence of evidence of significant heterogeneity or publication bias. Meta-regression analyses showed that the working memory deficit was not simply explained by discrepancies in current IQ between schizophrenia and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Large deficits in working memory were demonstrated in schizophrenia groups across all three working memory domains. There were, however, no clear differences across subdomains or between particular working memory tasks. There was substantial heterogeneity across results that could only be partly explained.
BACKGROUND:Memory impairment is being recognized increasingly as an important feature of the neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Dysfunction of working memory, a system for the short-term storage and manipulation of information, may relate to a number of core symptoms of schizophrenia. Many studies have examined working memory function in schizophrenia but a clear understanding of the nature and extent of any deficit has been elusive. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing working memory function in subjects with schizophrenia and healthy controls was performed. Following a comprehensive literature search, meta-analyses were conducted on 36 measures of phonological, visuospatial and central executive working memory functioning, encompassing 441 separate results from 187 different studies. RESULTS: Statistically significant effect sizes were found for all working memory measures, indicating deficits in schizophrenia groups. Some of these were robust findings in the absence of evidence of significant heterogeneity or publication bias. Meta-regression analyses showed that the working memory deficit was not simply explained by discrepancies in current IQ between schizophrenia and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Large deficits in working memory were demonstrated in schizophrenia groups across all three working memory domains. There were, however, no clear differences across subdomains or between particular working memory tasks. There was substantial heterogeneity across results that could only be partly explained.
Authors: Alysa E Doyle; Pieter J Vuijk; Nathan D Doty; Lauren M McGrath; Brian L Willoughby; Ellen H O'Donnell; H Kent Wilson; Mary K Colvin; Deanna C Toner; Kelsey E Hudson; Jessica E Blais; Hillary L Ditmars; Stephen V Faraone; Larry J Seidman; Ellen B Braaten Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Pascal Missonnier; François R Herrmann; Adriano Zanello; Maryse Badan Bâ; Logos Curtis; Diana Canovas; Fabrice Chantraine; Jonas Richiardi; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos; Marco C G Merlo Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Michael J Coleman; Olga Krastoshevsky; Xiawei Tu; Nancy R Mendell; Deborah L Levy Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-05-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Leonardo Fazio; Giulio Pergola; Marco Papalino; Pasquale Di Carlo; Anna Monda; Barbara Gelao; Nicola Amoroso; Sabina Tangaro; Antonio Rampino; Teresa Popolizio; Alessandro Bertolino; Giuseppe Blasi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Luna Fomsgaard; Jose L Moreno; Mario de la Fuente Revenga; Tomasz Brudek; Dea Adamsen; Cristobal Rio-Alamos; Justin Saunders; Anders Bue Klein; Ignasi Oliveras; Toni Cañete; Gloria Blazquez; Adolf Tobeña; Albert Fernandez-Teruel; Javier Gonzalez-Maeso; Susana Aznar Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Joshua Chiappelli; Laura M Rowland; Francesca M Notarangelo; S Andrea Wijtenburg; Marian A R Thomas; Ana Pocivavsek; Aaron Jones; Krista Wisner; Peter Kochunov; Robert Schwarcz; L Elliot Hong Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 7.853