Literature DB >> 18944448

Interference Between D and M Types of Plum pox virus in Japanese Plum Assessed by Specific Monoclonal Antibodies and Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Nieves Capote, M Teresa Gorris, M Carmen Martínez, Margarita Asensio, Antonio Olmos, Mariano Cambra.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT The dynamics of virus interference between two isolates of Plum pox virus (PPV) belonging to the main PPV types, D and M, were analyzed in Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) by challenge inoculations. To assess the consequences of a PPV-M infection on plum already infected with PPV-D, and vice versa (predominance of one of the strains, recombination, synergism, symptoms aggravation, and so on), 30 Japanese plum trees were graft inoculated with PPV-D or PPV-M isolates in quarantine conditions. One year postinoculation, in the event that the inoculated isolates were detected in the whole plant, a second challenge inoculation (PPV-M or PPV-D, respectively) was performed by grafting. The presence of PPV-D, PPV-M, or both was monitored for 7 years by double-antibody sandwich indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using specific monoclonal antibodies. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with D- and M-specific primers confirmed the serological typing. Real-time RT-PCR assays were performed using D- and M-specific fluorescent 3' minor groove binder-DNA probes, which were able to detect and quantify PPV populations in the inoculated plants with greater precision. The presence of PPV-D in Japanese plum did not cross-protect the trees against PPV-M infection. In PPV-D-infected plants, the PPV-M strain used as challenge inoculum behaved differently depending on the plum cultivar assayed. In cv. Black Diamond, PPV-M invaded the plant progressively, displacing the previous PPV-D population; whereas, in cv. Sun Gold, both PPV isolates coexisted in the plant. In contrast, the PPV-D isolate used was unable to infect plants of both cultivars in which a PPV-M population already was established. After 7 years, no synergism was observed and no recombination event between PPV-D and PPV-M genomes was detected.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18944448     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  5 in total

1.  The Coat Protein and NIa Protease of Two Potyviridae Family Members Independently Confer Superinfection Exclusion.

Authors:  Satyanarayana Tatineni; Roy French
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Rice black-streaked dwarf virus P10 acts as either a synergistic or antagonistic determinant during superinfection with related or unrelated virus.

Authors:  Hehong Zhang; Xiaoxiang Tan; Yuqing He; Kaili Xie; Lulu Li; Rong Wang; Gaojie Hong; Junmin Li; Jing Li; Michael Taliansky; Stuart MacFarlane; Fei Yan; Jianping Chen; Zongtao Sun
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.663

Review 3.  Genomic, Morphological and Biological Traits of the Viruses Infecting Major Fruit Trees.

Authors:  Muhammad Umer; Jiwen Liu; Huafeng You; Chuan Xu; Kaili Dong; Ni Luo; Linghong Kong; Xuepei Li; Ni Hong; Guoping Wang; Xudong Fan; Ioly Kotta-Loizou; Wenxing Xu
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  Sharka: the past, the present and the future.

Authors:  Jiri Sochor; Petr Babula; Vojtech Adam; Boris Krska; Rene Kizek
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Assessment of the diversity and dynamics of Plum pox virus and aphid populations in transgenic European plums under Mediterranean conditions.

Authors:  Nieves Capote; Jordi Pérez-Panadés; César Monzó; Emilio Carbonell; Alberto Urbaneja; Ralph Scorza; Michel Ravelonandro; Mariano Cambra
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.145

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.