Literature DB >> 18944330

Rhizobacteria-Mediated Growth Promotion of Tomato Leads to Protection Against Cucumber mosaic virus.

John F Murphy, M S Reddy, Choong-Min Ryu, Joseph W Kloepper, Ruhui Li.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT We evaluated combinations of two strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) formulated with the carrier chitosan for the ability to induce growth promotion of tomato plants and resistance to infection by Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Each PGPR combination included GB03 (Bacillus subtilis) and one of the following PGPR strains: SE34 (B. pumilus), IN937a (B. amyloliquefaciens), IN937b (B. subtilis), INR7 (B. pumilus), or T4 (B. pumilus). The PGPR combinations formulated with chitosan are referred to as biopreparations. Tomato plants treated with each of the biopreparations appeared phenotypically and developmentally similar to nonbacterized control plants that were 10 days older (referred to as the older control). When plants were challenged with CMV, all plants in the biopreparation treatments and the older control treatment had significantly greater height, fresh weight, and flower and fruit numbers than that of plants in the CMV-inoculated same age control treatment. CMV disease severity ratings were significantly lower for biopreparation-treated and older control tomato plants than for that of same age control plants at 14 and 28 days postinoculation (dpi). CMV accumulation in young noninoculated leaves was significantly less for all biopreparation-treated plants and those in the older control than for the same age control plants at 14 dpi and for four of the five biopreparation treatments at 28 dpi. In those tomato plants shown to be infected, the amount of CMV in noninoculated leaves was significantly lower for three of the biopreparation treatments and the older control treatment at 14 dpi and biopreparation G/INR7 treatment at 28 dpi when compared with the control treatment. These data show that treatment of tomato plants with biopreparations results in significant enhancement of growth and protection against infection by CMV.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 18944330     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.10.1301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  21 in total

1.  Biological control and plant growth promoting capacity of rhizobacteria on pepper under greenhouse and field conditions.

Authors:  Mi-Seon Hahm; Marilyn Sumayo; Ye-Ji Hwang; Seon-Ae Jeon; Sung-Jin Park; Jai Youl Lee; Joon-Hyung Ahn; Byung-Soo Kim; Choong-Min Ryu; Sa-Youl Ghim
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  The rhizobacterial elicitor acetoin induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Thimmaraju Rudrappa; Meredith L Biedrzycki; Sridhara G Kunjeti; Nicole M Donofrio; Kirk J Czymmek; Paul W Paré; Harsh P Bais
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-03

3.  Biocontrol Potential of Endophytic Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria against Phytopathogenic Viruses: Molecular Interaction with the Host Plant and Comparison with Chitosan.

Authors:  Gul-I-Rayna Shahzad; Alessandro Passera; Giusva Maldera; Paola Casati; Iriti Marcello; Piero Attilio Bianco
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  The folate precursor para-aminobenzoic acid elicits induced resistance against Cucumber mosaic virus and Xanthomonas axonopodis.

Authors:  Geun Cheol Song; Hye Kyung Choi; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 5.  Dynamic chemical communication between plants and bacteria through airborne signals: induced resistance by bacterial volatiles.

Authors:  Mohamed A Farag; Huiming Zhang; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Effects of bacterial inoculants on the indigenous microbiome and secondary metabolites of chamomile plants.

Authors:  Ruth Schmidt; Martina Köberl; Amr Mostafa; Elshahat M Ramadan; Marlene Monschein; Kenneth B Jensen; Rudolf Bauer; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Impact of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculation and Grafting on Tolerance of Tomato to Combined Water and Nutrient Stress Assessed via Metabolomics Analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kalozoumis; Dimitrios Savvas; Konstantinos Aliferis; Georgia Ntatsi; George Marakis; Evridiki Simou; Anastasia Tampakaki; Ioannis Karapanos
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  ISR meets SAR outside: additive action of the endophyte Bacillus pumilus INR7 and the chemical inducer, benzothiadiazole, on induced resistance against bacterial spot in field-grown pepper.

Authors:  Hwe-Su Yi; Jung Wook Yang; Choong-Min Ryu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Bacillus thuringiensis suppresses bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum with systemic induction of defense-related gene expression in tomato.

Authors:  Mitsuro Hyakumachi; Mitsuyoshi Nishimura; Tatsuyuki Arakawa; Shinichiro Asano; Shigenobu Yoshida; Seiya Tsushima; Hideki Takahashi
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity.

Authors:  Deepak Bhardwaj; Mohammad Wahid Ansari; Ranjan Kumar Sahoo; Narendra Tuteja
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.