Literature DB >> 18944091

Factors that Affect Spread of Pseudomonas syringae in the Phyllosphere.

Christen D Upper, Susan S Hirano, Kimberly K Dodd, Murray K Clayton.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT Successful spread of an organism to a new habitat requires both immigration to and growth on that habitat. Field experiments were conducted to determine the relative roles of dispersal (i.e., immigration) and bacterial multiplication in spread of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in the phyllosphere. To study spread, individual plots consisted of three nested concentric squares with the inner 6 m(2) planted to snap beans serving as the sink. Each sink, in turn, was surrounded by a barrier zone, usually 6 m wide, which was surrounded by a 6-m-wide source area. The source areas were planted with snap bean seeds inoculated with doubly marked strains derived from wild-type P. syringae pv. syringae B728a. The treatments were designed to test the effects of the nature and width of the barrier zone and suitability of the habitat in the sinks on spread of P. syringae pv. syringae. The marked strains introduced into the source areas at the time of planting were consistently detected in sink areas within a day or two after emergence of bean seedlings in the sources as assessed by leaf imprinting and dilution plating. The amounts of spread (population sizes of the marked strain in sinks) across barrier zones planted to snap bean (a suitable habitat for growth of P. syringae pv. syringae), soybean (not a favorable habitat for P. syringae pv. syringae), and bare ground were not significantly different. Thus, the nature of the barrier had no measurable effect on spread. Similarly, spread across bare-ground barriers 20 m wide was not significantly different from that across barriers 6 m wide, indicating that distance on this scale was not a major factor in determining the amount of spread. The suitability of the sink for colonization by P. syringae pv. syringae had a measurable effect on spread. Spread to sinks planted to clean seed was greater than that to sinks planted with bean seeds inoculated with a slurry of pulverized brown spot diseased bean leaves, sinks planted 3 weeks before sources, and sinks planted to a snap bean cultivar that does not support large numbers of P. syringae pv. syringae. Based of these results, we conclude that the small amount of dispersal that occurred on the scale studied was sufficient to support extensive spread, and suitability of the habitat for multiplication of P. syringae pv. syringae strongly influenced the amount of spread.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 18944091     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.9.1082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  4 in total

1.  Aggregates of resident bacteria facilitate survival of immigrant bacteria on leaf surfaces.

Authors:  J-M Monier; S E Lindow
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Pea aphid as both host and vector for the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

Authors:  John Stavrinides; Jodi K McCloskey; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Leaf shedding as an anti-bacterial defense in Arabidopsis cauline leaves.

Authors:  O Rahul Patharkar; Walter Gassmann; John C Walker
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Predictive modeling of Pseudomonas syringae virulence on bean using gradient boosted decision trees.

Authors:  Renan N D Almeida; Michael Greenberg; Cedoljub Bundalovic-Torma; Alexandre Martel; Pauline W Wang; Maggie A Middleton; Syama Chatterton; Darrell Desveaux; David S Guttman
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.464

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.