Literature DB >> 18942897

Team approach to ERCP-directed single-brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy.

M Urbano1, A Rosa, D Gomes, E Camacho, C A Calhau, M Leitão.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of single-brush cytology performed at ERCP as initial method for detecting pancreatobiliary malignancy, ensuring a very close relationship between endoscopists, cytotechnicians, and cytopathologists. STUDY
DESIGN: All 125 cytodiagnoses considered in this study correspond to the first brushing for each patient, collected by one of the three members of a fixed team of endoscopists in the presence of the same cytotechnician. Smears were fixed immediately with Merckofix spray, stained with Papanicolau, and analyzed by the same cytopathologist in a laboratory exclusively devoted to gastrointestinal cytopathology located at the endoscopy unit.
RESULTS: Of 125 cytological diagnoses 94 were considered benign, 4 suspicious, and 27 malignant. These findings were compared to the final diagnosis of 45 malignant and 80 benign lesions obtained either by surgical pathology or after at least one year of clinical follow-up. The comparison yielded 30 true positives, 78 true negatives, 1 false positive and 16 false negative results, which corresponds to a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 65.2, 98.7, 96.8, 83, and 86.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Results seem to confirm the usefulness of an effective team approach to ERCP-directed brush cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary malignancy. However, sensitivity continues to be rather low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18942897     DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082008000800003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig        ISSN: 1130-0108            Impact factor:   2.086


  4 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of brush cytology alone and in combination with tumor markers in pancreaticobiliary strictures.

Authors:  Ufuk Barış Kuzu; Bülent Ödemiş; Nesrin Turhan; Erkan Parlak; Selçuk Dişibeyaz; Nuretdin Suna; Erkin Öztaş; Muhammet Yener Akpınar; Adem Aksoy; Serkan Torun; Hakan Yıldız; Ertuğrul Kayaçetin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.260

2.  Diagnosis of Malignant Biliary Strictures: Conventional or Negative Pressure Brush Cytology?

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Abbasi; Seyedeh Masoumeh Ghazi Mirsaeed; Amir Houshang Mohammad Alizadeh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures.

Authors:  Abdulsemed M Nur; Misbah Salim; Scott Boerner; Suqing Li; Cindy C Y Law; Leanne Edwards; Kaitlin Ryan; Paul D James
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-05

4.  Outcomes of Different Methods for Analysis of Biliary Brush Cytology and of Factors Associated with Positive Diagnosis in an Age-Dependent Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Mariana Costa; Jorge Canena; Luís Mascarenhas-Lemos; Rafaela Loureiro; Mário Silva; Diana Carvalho; Tiago Capela; Pedro Russo; Gonçalo Ramos; António Mateus-Dias; Mário Ferraz-Oliveira; Pedro Mota Veiga; João Coimbra
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.