Literature DB >> 18941787

Contrasting impacts of invasive engineers on freshwater ecosystems: an experiment and meta-analysis.

Shin-Ichiro S Matsuzaki1, Nisikawa Usio, Noriko Takamura, Izumi Washitani.   

Abstract

Invasion by common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in shallow lakes have been followed by stable-state changes from a macrophyte-dominated clear water state to a phytoplankton-dominated turbid water state. Both invasive carp and crayfish are, therefore, possible drivers for catastrophic regime shifts. Despite these two species having been introduced into ecosystems world-wide, their relative significance on regime shifts remains largely unexplored. We compared the ecological impacts of carp and crayfish on submerged macrophytes, water quality, phytoplankton, nutrient dynamics, zooplankton and benthic macroinvertebrates by combining an enclosure experiment and a meta-analysis. The experiment was designed to examine how water quality and biological variables responded to increasing carp or crayfish biomass. We found that even at a low biomass, carp had large and positive impacts on suspended solids, phytoplankton and nutrients and negative impacts on benthic macroinvertebrates. In contrast, crayfish had a strong negative impact on submerged macrophytes. The impacts of crayfish on macrophytes were significantly greater than those of carp. The meta-analysis showed that both carp and crayfish have significant effects on submerged macrophytes, phytoplankton, nutrient dynamics and benthic macroinvertebrates, while zooplankton are affected by carp but not crayfish. It also indicated that crayfish have significantly greater impacts on macrophytes relative to carp. Overall, the meta-analysis largely supported the results of the experiment. Taken as a whole, our results show that both carp and crayfish have profound effects on community composition and ecosystem processes through combined consequences of bioturbation, excretion, consumption and non-consumptive destruction. However, key variables (e.g. macrophytes) relating to stable-state changes responded differently to increasing carp or crayfish biomass, indicating that they have differential ecosystem impacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941787     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1180-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems.

Authors:  M Scheffer; S Carpenter; J A Foley; C Folke; B Walker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The role of omnivorous crayfish in littoral communities.

Authors:  Nathan J Dorn; Jeremy M Wojdak
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems.

Authors:  James E Byers; Kim Cuddington; Clive G Jones; Theresa S Talley; Alan Hastings; John G Lambrinos; Jeffrey A Crooks; William G Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology.

Authors:  Katharine N Suding; Katherine L Gross; Gregory R Houseman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis.

Authors:  C W Osenberg; O Sarnelle; S D Cooper
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes.

Authors:  M Scheffer; S H Hosper; M L Meijer; B Moss; E Jeppesen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Co-occurrence of habitat-modifying invertebrates: effects on structural and functional properties of a created salt marsh.

Authors:  Katharyn E Boyer; Peggy Fong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Biotic control of stream fluxes: spawning salmon drive nutrient and matter export.

Authors:  Jonathan W Moore; Daniel E Schindler; Jackie L Carter; Justin Fox; Jennifer Griffiths; Gordon W Holtgrieve
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.499

  8 in total
  14 in total

1.  Invasion biology in non-free-living species: interactions between abiotic (climatic) and biotic (host availability) factors in geographical space in crayfish commensals (Ostracoda, Entocytheridae).

Authors:  Alexandre Mestre; Josep A Aguilar-Alberola; David Baldry; Husamettin Balkis; Adam Ellis; Jose A Gil-Delgado; Karsten Grabow; Göran Klobučar; Antonín Kouba; Ivana Maguire; Andreas Martens; Ayşegül Mülayim; Juan Rueda; Burkhard Scharf; Menno Soes; Juan S Monrós; Francesc Mesquita-Joanes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Complex impacts of an invasive omnivore and native consumers on stream communities in California and Hawaii.

Authors:  Kristie Klose; Scott D Cooper
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Cross-habitat effects shape the ecosystem consequences of co-invasion by a pelagic and a benthic consumer.

Authors:  David C Fryxell; Amber R Diluzio; Maya A Friedman; Nicklaus A Menge; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Physiological performance of native and invasive crayfish species in a changing environment: insights from Dynamic Energy Budget models.

Authors:  Nina Marn; Sandra Hudina; Ines Haberle; Ana Dobrović; Tin Klanjšček
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Habitat connectivity and resident shared predators determine the impact of invasive bullfrogs on native frogs in farm ponds.

Authors:  Takashi Atobe; Yutaka Osada; Hayato Takeda; Misako Kuroe; Tadashi Miyashita
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds.

Authors:  Teruhiko Takahara; Toshifumi Minamoto; Hideyuki Doi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Invasive crayfish threaten the development of submerged macrophytes in lake restoration.

Authors:  Jessica E M van der Wal; Martijn Dorenbosch; Anne K Immers; Constanza Vidal Forteza; Jeroen J M Geurts; Edwin T H M Peeters; Bram Koese; Elisabeth S Bakker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting invasive species impacts: a community module functional response approach reveals context dependencies.

Authors:  Rachel A Paterson; Jaimie T A Dick; Daniel W Pritchard; Marilyn Ennis; Melanie J Hatcher; Alison M Dunn
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Habitat modification by invasive crayfish can facilitate its growth through enhanced food accessibility.

Authors:  Shota Nishijima; Chisato Nishikawa; Tadashi Miyashita
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  'Leaves and eats shoots': direct terrestrial feeding can supplement invasive red swamp crayfish in times of need.

Authors:  Jonathan Grey; Michelle C Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.