| Literature DB >> 18941505 |
Dario Alberto Dilernia1, Leandro Jones, Sabrina Rodriguez, Gabriela Turk, Andrea E Rubio, Sandra Pampuro, Manuel Gomez-Carrillo, Christian T Bautista, Christian Bautista, Gabriel Deluchi, Jorge Benetucci, María Beatriz Lasala, Leonardo Lourtau, Marcelo Horacio Losso, Héctor Perez, Pedro Cahn, Horacio Salomón.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte (CTL) response drives the evolution of HIV-1 at a host-level by selecting HLA-restricted escape mutations. Dissecting the dynamics of these escape mutations at a population-level would help to understand how HLA-mediated selection drives the evolution of HIV-1. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18941505 PMCID: PMC2565011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of the 22 potential CTL-escape mutations identified through statistical analysis.
| Position States | Adjusted | Epitope Analysis | ||||||
| HLA | Consensus | Polimorphism | HXB2 position | OR |
|
| Sequence | Known/predicted |
|
| ||||||||
| A03 | K | Q R | P028 | 21.0 | <10−7 | 0.0006 |
| Known |
| B57 | T | N | P242 | 54.7 | 0.0002 | 0.0013 |
| Known |
| A11 | A | K M T V | P118 | 10.5 | 0.0018 | 0.0019 |
| NetMHC |
| A03 | E | D G | P055 | 4.8 | 0.0123 | 0.0139 | - | - |
|
| ||||||||
| B07 | G | S | P357 | 13.8 | 0.0050 | 0.0051 |
| Known |
| A24 | R | K | P030 | 0.21 | 0.0076 | 0.0070 |
| Known |
| A11 | G | S | P357 | 13.2 | 0.0070 | 0.0063 |
| Known |
| A02 | Q | H | P065 | 4.8 | 0.0031 | 0.0025 |
| Epipred/NetMHC |
| B40 | T | A | P081 | 5.8 | 0.0084 | 0.0076 | - | - |
| A24 | V | L I | P046 | 3.4 | 0.0090 | 0.0082 | - | - |
|
| ||||||||
| A02 | A | V | P083 | 0.13 | 0.0043 | 0.0038 |
| Known |
| A01 | GAP/N | S | P125 | NPC | 0.0105 | 0.0114 |
| Epipred/NetMHC |
|
| ||||||||
| B49 | K | E Q A D | P012 | 0.00 | 0.0116 | 0.0127 | - | - |
| B40 | Q | K R N | P090 | 0.00 | 0.0104 | 0.0102 | - | - |
| A02 | A | P S T | P146 | 0.27 | 0.0099 | 0.0095 | - | - |
| A01 | L | I V M | P215 | 0.00 | 0.0105 | 0.0108 | - | - |
| A31 | T | S | P342 | 0.12 | 0.0063 | 0.0057 | - | - |
| A31 | N | S T G | P372 | NPC | 0.0099 | 0.0089 | - | - |
| B08 | T | V A | P303 | 4.0 | 0.0047 | 0.0044 | - | - |
| B49 | E | D | P312 | 15.6 | 0.0119 | 0.0133 | - | - |
| A01 | P | T S Q I | P339 | 4.9 | 0.0042 | 0.0032 | - | - |
| A24 | T | S | P342 | 5.9 | 0.0110 | 0.0121 | - | - |
Detailed are the positions of the mutations in HXB2 Gag protein (http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/sequence/ LOCATE/locate.html, see Figure S1), the HLA allele associated, the most frequent aminoacidic residue found at each position (consensus) and the polymorphisms found in those positions. All of the associations shown in the table have a q-value lower than 0.2 (in our data set equivalent to an adjusted p-value lower than 0.0140). Mutations are classified accordingly to whether they were strongly, moderately or not supported by phylogenetic correction and to whether they were or not located within known or predicted epitopes. In black-cursive are highlighted positions where escape was identified and enlarged are anchor residues for binding with the HLA molecule. In column 9 is detailed whether the mutations was located within a known epitope (“Known”) according to Los Alamos Best-defined CTL/CD8+ Epitope Summary or predicted epitope according to the NetMHC 3.0 (“NetMHC”, CBS Prediction Server, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark) and/or Epipred softwares (“Epipred”, Microsoft Research). NPC: not possible to calculate.
Figure 1Trends in time of polymorphisms identified as potential CTL-escape mutations.
Trend lines for the 3-point in time prevalence estimated are shown (prevalence estimated at each time available in table S3). Mutations were classified according to viral subtype (Subtype F in left panel, subtype B in right panel), according to whether they were identified through statistical analysis (upper panel) or trend analysis (lower panel), and according to whether they were identified through negative (black) or positive (blue) ORs. Mutations at positions P30 and P83 are repeated on upper and lower panels as they were significantly associated to an HLA allele (q-value<0.2) and also shown a significant trend in time (Chi-squared for trend <0.05). Except for mutations on positions P30 on subtype F and P215 on subtype B, trends are toward an increase or a stable prevalence in time. Particularly, those that are at present the most common state (identified through negative OR, black lines) show the higher increase in time.
Summary of the 12 polymorphisms found to have significantly changed in time during the last twenty years.
| Residue position |
| Position states | Sequence of known eptiopes | In our study | State that increases in time | ||||
| Subtype B | Subtype F | Consensus | Polimorphims | OR | Power |
| |||
|
| |||||||||
| P030 | 0.038 | 0.106 | R | K |
|
|
|
| R |
|
| NC | 0.42 | |||||||
| P076 | 0.029 | 0.030 | R | K |
| 1.70 | 0.08 | K | |
|
| 1.25 | 0.05 | |||||||
| P083 | 0.904 | 0.031 | A | V |
|
|
|
| A |
|
| NC | <0.01 | |||||||
| P084 | 0.012 | 0.730 |
|
|
|
| V | ||
| V | T |
| 1.79 | 0.13 | |||||
|
| 2.83 | 0.30 | |||||||
| P095 | 0.088 | 0.040 | K | R |
| 0.82 | 0.15 | K | |
| P215 | 0.031 | 0.930 | L | V |
| 0.42 | 0.15 | L | |
| P218 | 0.047 | 0.770 | V | A |
| 2.84 | 0.29 | A | |
|
| NPC | 0.03 | |||||||
| P223 | 0.123 | 0.009 | I | V |
| 1.55 | 0.13 | V | |
| P280 | 0.601 | 0.020 | V | T |
| 2.61 | 0.11 | T | |
|
| NPC | NPC | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
| P090 | 0.614 | 0.028 | Q | K R |
| (2) | |||
|
| |||||||||
| P054 | 0.555 | 0.009 | S | A P T |
| (2) | |||
| P138 | 0.628 | 0.040 | L | A F H I M P V |
| (2) | |||
Detailed are the p-values obtained by Chi-squared test for trend. Note that except for position P76, the other positions have significantly changed only in one of either the B or F subtype. Aminoacidic sequences of known epitopes surrounding these mutations are shown, and highlighted in black-cursive the residue that changed. Enlarged are the anchor residues for binding to the HLA molecule. Statistical results for the pair position-HLAallele in our study are detailed. Note that we only have enough statistical power to detect association at positions P30, P83 and P84. (1) In these cases no information was available of anchor residues. (2) In these cases was observed a significant increase in time of all the residues alternatives to the consensus residue as a group. NPC: not possible to calculate.
Figure 2Mean frequency of escape mutations across time.
Percentage of sequences harboring the escape mutations are represented on the vertical axis. As there is no previous data available to know what mutations might dominate B or F subtype, classification of mutations had to be performed a-posteriori: Those found to dominate a viral subtype (green line) and the remaining according to whether they were identified through negative (blue line) or positive (red line) ORs. Groups compositions were as follow: red group = P028, P046, P055, P065, P081, P118, P242 and P375 in both subtype B and F; blue group = P030, P084 and P125 in subtype B and P083 in subtype F; green group = P030, P084 and P125 in subtype F and P083 in subtype B. Statistical analysis performed by GLM Repeated Measures showed that these three groups have had significantly different behaviors in time: escape mutations identified through positive associations have always remained in a low prevalence while those identified through negative associations (as they are now the most common state) have always dominated one of either B or F subtype, or been previously in a low prevalence and increased significantly in time until becoming the most prevalent state in the subtype they do not dominate. These trends suggest a convergence of viral subtypes mediated by HLA selection.
Figure 3Trends in time of escape mutations identified through negative ORs in both B and F viral subtypes.
The four mutations identified are currently in the majority of circulating HIV strains, regardless of viral subtype. However, analysis of their prevalence back in time showed that in the early years of epidemic they dominated only one of either the B or F subtype while they were in a low prevalence in the other subtype. This means that they have accumulated in time and driven a convergence of viral subtypes toward variants more able to evade the immune response of the human hosts.