Literature DB >> 18941396

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.

Ellen Warner1.   

Abstract

Most women at very high risk of breast cancer because of a mutation in the genes BRCA1 or BRCA2, or a very strong family history of breast cancer, opt for intensive breast screening rather than bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Annual screening mammography has low sensitivity in this population in part because of the greater breast density and faster tumor growth of younger women, resulting in cancers being detected at a suboptimal stage. In 11 prospective comparative studies, the addition of annual contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast to mammography demonstrated more than 90% sensitivity, more than twice that of mammography alone. False-positive rates were higher with the addition of MRI, but specificity improved on successive rounds of screening. Although survival data are not yet available, the stage distribution of these tumors predicts a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality rate compared with that of screening without MRI. Accordingly, annual MRI plus mammography is now the standard of care for screening women aged 30 years or older who are known or likely to have inherited a strong predisposition to breast cancer (based on the above evidence) and for women who received radiation therapy to the chest before the age of 30 years (based on expert opinion). Further research is necessary to define the optimal screening schedule for different subgroups. Formal studies of other high-risk populations (eg, biopsy showing lobular neoplasia or atypical ductal hyperplasia, dense breasts, and personal history of breast cancer at a young age) should be done before MRI screening is routinely adopted for these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941396     DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e31818bc994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  6 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of screening and prevention strategies among BRCA1/2-affected mutation carriers.

Authors:  Victor R Grann; Priya R Patel; Judith S Jacobson; Ellen Warner; Daniel F Heitjan; Maxine Ashby-Thompson; Dawn L Hershman; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Fahrettin Kilic; Hayri Ogul; Ummugulsum Bayraktutan; Hatice Gumus; Ozlem Unal; Mecit Kantarci; M Halit Yilmaz
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2012-08

Review 3.  Comparison of ductoscopy, galactography, and imaging modalities for the evaluation of intraductal lesions: a critical review.

Authors:  Ozgur Sarica; Enis Ozturk; Huseyin C Demirkurek; Fatih Uluc
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Algorithm-based method for detection of blood vessels in breast MRI for development of computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  Muqing Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer Surveillance Among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiaxin Li; Ziqi Jia; Menglu Zhang; Gang Liu; Zeyu Xing; Xin Wang; Xin Huang; Kexin Feng; Jiang Wu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Jiaqi Liu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Satisfaction and Quality of Life of Healthy and Unilateral Diseased BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire.

Authors:  Natalie Herold; Martin Hellmich; Frank Lichtenheldt; Beyhan Ataseven; Vanessa Hillebrand; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Rita Katharina Schmutzler; Kerstin Rhiem
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.141

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.