Literature DB >> 18941280

Convex reformulation of biologically-based multi-criteria intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization including fractionation effects.

Aswin L Hoffmann1, Dick den Hertog, Alex Y D Siem, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Henk Huizenga.   

Abstract

Finding fluence maps for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can be formulated as a multi-criteria optimization problem for which Pareto optimal treatment plans exist. To account for the dose-per-fraction effect of fractionated IMRT, it is desirable to exploit radiobiological treatment plan evaluation criteria based on the linear-quadratic (LQ) cell survival model as a means to balance the radiation benefits and risks in terms of biologic response. Unfortunately, the LQ-model-based radiobiological criteria are nonconvex functions, which make the optimization problem hard to solve. We apply the framework proposed by Romeijn et al (2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 1991-2013) to find transformations of LQ-model-based radiobiological functions and establish conditions under which transformed functions result in equivalent convex criteria that do not change the set of Pareto optimal treatment plans. The functions analysed are: the LQ-Poisson-based model for tumour control probability (TCP) with and without inter-patient heterogeneity in radiation sensitivity, the LQ-Poisson-based relative seriality s-model for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) under the LQ-Poisson model and the fractionation-corrected Probit-based model for NTCP according to Lyman, Kutcher and Burman. These functions differ from those analysed before in that they cannot be decomposed into elementary EUD or generalized-EUD functions. In addition, we show that applying increasing and concave transformations to the convexified functions is beneficial for the piecewise approximation of the Pareto efficient frontier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941280     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/22/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Personalized mid-course FDG-PET based adaptive treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer using machine learning and optimization.

Authors:  Ali Ajdari; Zhongxing Liao; Radhe Mohan; Xiong Wei; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.174

2.  (Radio)biological optimization of external-beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alan E Nahum; Julien Uzan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 3.  Radiobiological Optimization in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Are We Ready to Apply Radiobiological Models?

Authors:  Marco D'Andrea; Silvia Strolin; Sara Ungania; Alessandra Cacciatore; Vicente Bruzzaniti; Raffaella Marconi; Marcello Benassi; Lidia Strigari
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Radiobiological model-based bio-anatomical quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Park; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jin-Beom Chung; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Yon-Lae Kim; Byung-Moon Park; Youhyun Kim; Jungmin Kim; Jonghak Choi; Jae-Sung Kim; Semie Hong; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Mike Oliver; Will Ansbacher; Wayne A Beckham
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Prescription Value-Based Automatic Optimization of Importance Factors in Inverse Planning.

Authors:  Caiping Guo; Pengcheng Zhang; Zhiguo Gui; Huazhong Shu; Lihong Zhai; Jinrong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.