Literature DB >> 18940718

Reabsorption of ascites and the factors that affect this process in cirrhosis.

Sinan Akay1, Omer Ozutemiz, Murat Kilic, Zeki Karasu, Murat Akyildiz, Ercument Karasulu, Meral Baka, Basak Doganavsargil, Galip Ersoz, Sezgin Ulukaya, Isik Alper, Utku Ates, Yucel Batur.   

Abstract

Ascites is one of the main features of liver decompensation in cirrhosis, and it is considered to be a dynamic process. In this study, we aimed to (1) measure the reabsorption rate of ascites; (2) evaluate whether these findings were related to features of ascites, hemodynamics, and serum measurements; and (3) examine morphologic changes in the diaphragm of cirrhotic patients. In all, 42 cirrhotic patients with ascites were enrolled in the study to comprise our study group. Using the dextran 70 test, patient ascites volumes and reabsorption rates were measured. Biopsies from the peritoneal side of the diaphragm were also processed for scanning electron microscopy and lymphatic immunohistochemical studies from the cirrhotic patients and control cadavers. The mean ascites reabsorption rate was 4.5 +/- 4.5 (0.18-14.6) mL/min, which correlated significantly with the calculated ascites volume (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). The mean ascites viscosity was 1.07 +/- 0.07 (0.99-1.17) centipoise, which demonstrated a high degree of negative correlation with the ascites reabsorption rate (r = -0.77, P < 0.001). Patients with a history of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis had significantly lesser ascites reabsorption rates than patients without this particular history. The size of lymphatic stomata in scanning electron microscopy depictions was increased, and lymphatic lacunae were dilated in immunohistochemical studies in the cirrhotic patients with ascites. However, these findings were not uniform in every cirrhotic patient with ascites. The volume and viscosity of ascites seem to influence its reabsorption rate. Additionally, previous episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis may be responsible for the decreased ascites reabsorption rates observed in certain patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18940718     DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2008.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Res        ISSN: 1878-1810            Impact factor:   7.012


  4 in total

1.  The role of ascitic fluid viscosity in the differential diagnosis of ascites.

Authors:  Huseyin Savas Gokturk; Mehmet Demir; Nevin Akcaer Ozturk; Gulhan Kanat Unler; Sevsen Kulaksizoglu; Ilknur Kozanoglu; Ender Serin; Ugur Yilmaz
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 2.  Ascitic Fluid Analysis in the Differential Diagnosis of Ascites: Focus on Cirrhotic Ascites.

Authors:  Lin-Lin Huang; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Sen-Lin Zhu
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Intraperitoneal Activation of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis in Patients with Cirrhosis and Ascites.

Authors:  Johannes Thaler; Ton Lisman; Peter Quehenberger; Lena Hell; Philipp Schwabl; Bernhard Scheiner; Theresa Bucsics; Rienk Nieuwland; Cihan Ay; Michael Trauner; Ingrid Pabinger; Thomas Reiberger; Mattias Mandorfer
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 6.681

4.  Pathological Characterization of Ovarian Cancer Patients Who Underwent Debulking Surgery in Combination With Diaphragmatic Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Takeshi Nagai; Hisashi Oshiro; Yasukazu Sagawa; Kentaro Sakamaki; Fumitoshi Terauchi; Toshitaka Nagao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.