Literature DB >> 18940284

Comparison of the impact of short (<1 year) and long-term (> or =1 year) clopidogrel use following percutaneous coronary intervention on mortality.

Subhash Banerjee1, Cyril Varghese, Jepsin Samuel, Rick A Weideman, Bertis B Little, Kevin C Kelly, Sunil V Rao, Robert F Reilly, Emmanouil S Brilakis.   

Abstract

The optimal duration of clopidogrel administration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unknown. Clopidogrel is currently recommended for minimums of 1 and 12 months after bare-metal stent and drug-eluting stent implantation, respectively. To determine the impact of clopidogrel discontinuation 1 year after PCI, the outcomes of 530 consecutive patients who underwent PCI from January 2004 to July 2006, were free of cardiovascular events for 6 months after PCI, and had follow-up available for >12 months were examined. The outcomes of patients who received clopidogrel for > or =1 year were compared with those of patients who received it for <1 year. The mean age was 65 +/- 9 years. Patients often presented with acute coronary syndromes (57%), and 85% received drug-eluting stents. Clopidogrel was used for > or =1 year and for <1 year in 341 and 189 patients, respectively. During a mean follow-up period of 2.4 +/- 0.8 years, 40 patients (8%) died, 21 (4%) had acute myocardial infarctions, and 89 (17%) underwent repeat coronary revascularization. Compared with patients with clopidogrel administration for <1 year after PCI, those who received clopidogrel for > or =1 year had lower mortality (14.8% vs 3.5%, p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, clopidogrel use for > or =1 year was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.59), independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, clinical presentation, and the use of drug-eluting stents. In conclusion, the use of clopidogrel for > or =1 year after PCI was associated with lower mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18940284     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Clinical effectiveness of coronary stents in elderly persons: results from 262,700 Medicare patients in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; J Matthew Brennan; Kevin J Anstrom; Art Sedrakyan; Eric L Eisenstein; Ghazala Haque; David Dai; David F Kong; Bradley Hammill; Lesley Curtis; David Matchar; Ralph Brindis; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Taiwanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Outcome Report of a Multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Chi-Cheng Lai; Hon-Kan Yip; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Chiung-Jen Wu; Wen-Ter Lai; Chun-Peng Liu; Shu-Chen Chang; Guang-Yuan Mar
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Effectiveness of Two-Year versus One-Year Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Reducing the Risk of Very Late Stent Thrombosis after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Poorhosseini; Seyed Kianoosh Hosseini; Tahereh Davarpasand; Masoumeh Lotfi Tokaldany; Mojtaba Salarifar; Seyed Ebrahim Kassaian; Mohammad Alidoosti; Younes Nozari; Ebrahim Nematipour; Ali Mohammad Haji Zeinali; Hasan Aghajani; Ali Reza Amirzadegan
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2012-05-31

4.  Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention on re-hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Shih-Chin Chen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao; Chii-Ming Lee; William Wei-Yuan Hsu; Churn-Shiouh Gau
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.