Literature DB >> 18940192

Sequential object recognition deficits in normal readers.

Cherie L La Rocque1, Troy A W Visser.   

Abstract

The present work examined the relationship between sequential object recognition and variations in normal reading ability. A group of normal readers completed a battery of tests examining nonverbal intelligence, rapid-automatized naming, reading ability, and an attentional blink (AB) task in which they were asked to identify two sequential targets embedded amongst distractors. Consistent with previous studies, all participants showed a significant AB, with second-target identification improving as inter-target interval increased. More critically, low-normal readers showed a larger AB than high-normal readers. Considered in context with earlier work, these results imply that the ability to allocate capacity-limited processing resources to sequential visual inputs is linked to reading proficiency across the range of both disabled and normal readers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18940192     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  How does information processing speed relate to the attentional blink?

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Temporal variability predicts the magnitude of between-group attentional blink differences in developmental dyslexia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas A Badcock; Joanna C Kidd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Evidence for deficits in the temporal attention span of poor readers.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Temporal sampling in vision and the implications for dyslexia.

Authors:  Kristen Pammer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.