Literature DB >> 18939911

Management of high defibrillation threshold.

Eric R Uyguanco1, Aaron Berger, Adam S Budzikowski, Moshe Gunsburg, John Kassotis.   

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become the primary therapy for the treatment of potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular arrhythmias encompass a spectrum of rhythm disturbances ranging from the occasional monomorphic ventricular premature complex to the almost universally fatal ventricular fibrillation. Our understanding of the mechanisms of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation is still in evolution. At present, the most common ICD configuration consists of a pectoral pulse generator (active-can) with a bipolar transvenous dual coil lead. A transvenous system with an active-can has improved defibrillation thresholds and the ease of implantation. However, there are various clinical scenarios in which patients with high defibrillation threshold (DFT) are encountered. Although the incidence of high DFT patients is low, it is of significant concern since it may account for sudden cardiac death in patients with ICDs. At present, there are few clinical trials that are rigorous and well designed, and which can define a perfect methodology for the treatment of high DFT patients. In this review, in the context of commonly encountered clinical scenarios, we discuss therapeutic strategies to help manage patients with high DFT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18939911     DOI: 10.1586/14779072.6.9.1237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther        ISSN: 1477-9072


  5 in total

1.  ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.

Authors:  Dirk Bastian; Stefan Kracker; Matthias Pauschinger; Konrad Göhl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-06-07

2.  Azygos vein lead implantation for high defibrillation thresholds in implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement.

Authors:  Naga Va Kommuri; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; E Saulitis; Ma Siddiqui
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-01-07

3.  Echocardiographic parameters to predict inadequate defibrillation safety margin in patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary prevention.

Authors:  Sachin Kumar Amruthlal Jain; Hamid Ghanbari; Rayan Hourani; Timothy R Larsen; Marcos Daccarett; Christian Machado
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Orthostatic increase in defibrillation threshold leading to defibrillation failure and prolonged cardiac arrest in a sitting position: Lessons from a patient's near-fatal experience.

Authors:  Xiaoke Liu; Samuel Asirvatham; G Glenn Kabell
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-28

5.  Intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing and postoperative long-term efficacy of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Tianyi Gan; Xiaozhi Cao; Zhang Yu; Baopeng Tang; Jinxin Li; Guojun Xu; Xianhui Zhou; Yanyi Zhang; Yaodong Li; Jianghua Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.