Literature DB >> 18939741

Planktonic and biofilm community characterization and Salmonella resistance of 14-day-old chicken cecal Microflora-derived continuous-flow cultures.

Tawni L Crippen1, Cynthia L Sheffield, Kathleen Andrews, Scot E Dowd, Roy J Bongaerts, David J Nisbet.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the composition of gastrointestinal bacterial communities in birds during an age in which their susceptibility to Salmonella is highly diminished. One of the challenges to developing probiotics is to develop an efficacious culture of minimal diversity that includes bacteria that are vital contributors to protection from pathogens, but excludes unnecessary species. This study used in vitro continuous-flow culture techniques to test the ability of mixed bacterial cultures acquired from in vivo sources, to resist colonization by a marker Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and then characterized the constituents of both biofilm and planktonic communities by biochemical, phenotypic, and molecular methods. These cultures, initiated from 14-day-old chicks, were all able to restrict colonization by Salmonella in an average of 10 days. Eighteen species of bacteria from 10 different genera were characterized. However, each culture contained a mixture of only 11 species, which included lactic acid bacteria. Biofilms contained less than 50% of the species found in the planktonic communities. Although not adults, the diversity of microbes within the cecal cultures from 14-day-old birds represents a community complex enough to oppose colonization by a nonindigenous bacteria in vitro. These results describe bacterial mixtures containing less diversity than in previously described avian protective cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18939741     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.10.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  3 in total

1.  In vitro Biofilm Formation by Bioluminescent Bacteria Isolated from the Marine Fish Gut.

Authors:  Olga Burtseva; Olga Baulina; Anna Zaytseva; Tatiana Fedorenko; Konstantin Chekanov; Elena Lobakova
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Can probiotics improve the environmental microbiome and resistome of commercial poultry production?

Authors:  Adriana A Pedroso; Anne L Hurley-Bacon; Andrea S Zedek; Tiffany W Kwan; Andrea P O Jordan; Gloria Avellaneda; Charles L Hofacre; Brian B Oakley; Stephen R Collett; John J Maurer; Margie D Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  How Management Practices Within a Poultry House During Successive Flock Rotations Change the Structure of the Soil Microbiome.

Authors:  Tawni L Crippen; Cynthia L Sheffield; Baneshwar Singh; J Allen Byrd; Ross C Beier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.