Literature DB >> 18939635

Using mean infectious dose of high- and low-pathogenicity avian influenza viruses originating from wild duck and poultry as one measure of infectivity and adaptation to poultry.

David E Swayne1, Richard D Slemons.   

Abstract

The mean infectious doses of selected avian influenza virus (AIV) isolates, determined in domestic poultry under experimental conditions, were shown to be both host-dependent and virus strain-dependent and could be considered one measure of the infectivity and adaptation to a specific host. As such, the mean infectious dose could serve as a quantitative predictor for which strains of AIV, given the right conditions, would be more likely transmitted to and maintained in a given species or subsequently cause an AI outbreak in the given species. The intranasal (IN) mean bird infectious doses (BID50) were determined for 11 high-pathogenicity AIV (HPAIV) isolates of turkey and chicken origin for white leghorn (WL) chickens, and for low-pathogenicity AIV (LPAIV) isolates of chicken (n = 1) and wild mallards (n = 2) for turkeys, and WL and white Plymouth rock (WPR) chickens, domestic ducks and geese, and Japanese quail. The BID50 for HPAIV isolates for WL chickens ranged from 10(1.2) to 10(4.7) mean embryo infectious dose (EID50) (median = 10(2.9)). For chicken-origin HPAIV isolates, the BID50 in WL chickens ranged from 10(1.2) to 10(3.0) EID50 (median = 10(2.6)), whereas for HPAIV isolates of turkey origin, the BID50 in WL chickens was higher, ranging from 10(2.8) to 10(4.7) EID50 (median = 10(3.9)). The BID50 of 10(4.7) was for a turkey-origin HPAIV virus that was not transmitted to chickens on the same farm, suggesting that, under the specific conditions present on that farm, there was insufficient infectivity, adaptation, or exposure to that virus population for sustained chicken transmission. Although the upper BID50 limit for predicting infectivity and sustainable transmissibility for a specific species is unknown, a BID50 < 10(4.7) was suggestive of such transmissibility. For the LPAIVs, there was a trend for domestic ducks and geese and Japanese quail to have the greatest susceptible and for WL chickens to be the most resistant, but turkeys were susceptible to two LPAIV tested when used at moderate challenge doses. This suggests domestic ducks and geese, turkeys, and Japanese quail could serve as bridging species for LPAIVs from wild waterfowl to chickens and other gallinaceous poultry. These data do provide support for the commonly held and intuitive belief that mixing of poultry species during rearing and in outdoor production systems is a major risk factor for interspecies transmission of AIVs and for the emergence of new AIV strains capable of causing AI outbreaks because these situations present a more diverse host population to circumvent the natural host dependency or host range of circulating viruses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18939635     DOI: 10.1637/8229-012508-Reg.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  44 in total

1.  Bird migration and risk for H5N1 transmission into Qinghai Lake, China.

Authors:  Peng Cui; Yuansheng Hou; Zhi Xing; Yubang He; Tianxian Li; Shan Guo; Ze Luo; Baoping Yan; Zuohua Yin; Fumin Lei
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.133

2.  Impact of route of exposure and challenge dose on the pathogenesis of H7N9 low pathogenicity avian influenza virus in chickens.

Authors:  Erica Spackman; Mary Pantin-Jackwood; David E Swayne; David L Suarez; Darrell R Kapczynski
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Association of Mx1 Asn631 variant alleles with reductions in morbidity, early mortality, viral shedding, and cytokine responses in chickens infected with a highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Sandra J Ewald; Darrell R Kapczynski; Emily J Livant; David L Suarez; John Ralph; Scott McLeod; Carolyn Miller
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Environmental transmission of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses and its implications for pathogen invasion.

Authors:  Pejman Rohani; Romulus Breban; David E Stallknecht; John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Changes in adaptation of H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza H5 clade 2.3.4.4 viruses in chickens and mallards.

Authors:  Eric DeJesus; Mar Costa-Hurtado; Diane Smith; Dong-Hun Lee; Erica Spackman; Darrell R Kapczynski; Mia Kim Torchetti; Mary L Killian; David L Suarez; David E Swayne; Mary J Pantin-Jackwood
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Recombinant hemagglutinin glycoproteins provide insight into binding to host cells by H5 influenza viruses in wild and domestic birds.

Authors:  Carmen Jerry; David Stallknecht; Christina Leyson; Roy Berghaus; Brian Jordan; Mary Pantin-Jackwood; Gavin Hitchener; Monique França
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Role of poultry in the spread of novel H7N9 influenza virus in China.

Authors:  Mary J Pantin-Jackwood; Patti J Miller; Erica Spackman; David E Swayne; Leonardo Susta; Mar Costa-Hurtado; David L Suarez
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Evaluation of a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect avian influenza virus antibodies in multiple experimentally infected avian species.

Authors:  Justin D Brown; David E Stallknecht; Roy D Berghaus; M Page Luttrell; Katherine Velek; Whitney Kistler; Taiana Costa; Michael J Yabsley; David Swayne
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-04-22

9.  Filter-feeding bivalves can remove avian influenza viruses from water and reduce infectivity.

Authors:  Christina Faust; David Stallknecht; David Swayne; Justin Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Species and age related differences in the type and distribution of influenza virus receptors in different tissues of chickens, ducks and turkeys.

Authors:  Smitha P S Pillai; Chang W Lee
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.