Literature DB >> 18937586

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in an elderly population: how to prevent complications and make the treatment safe and effective.

M C Sighinolfi1, S Micali, M Grande, A Mofferdin, S De Stefani, G Bianchi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to consider the feasibility and the results of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in an elderly cohort of patients, considering different diseases and concomitant morbidity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2003 up to July 2006, a total of 1100 SWL treatments were performed in our Stone Centre with Dornier Lithotripter S device. We retrospectively analyzed all the treatments carried out in patients older than 70 years of age, collecting a total of 130 patients. The average age was 75.1 years (range: 70-89). Stone location was renal in 95 and ureteral in 45 patients. Information about SWL outcomes and complications were collected as well as patient's characteristics and treatment modalities.
RESULTS: Average stone size was 10.2+/-3.4 and 8.7+/-3.1 for the renal and ureteral location, respectively. 73 out of 140 patients (52.1%) were stone free after a single treatment; 49 patients (35%) required an adjunctive session, whereas SWL was unsuccessful in 18 (12.8%) patients. We observed 64, 24, 21, 10, 31 cases of concomitant arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, solitary kidney condition and previous neoplastic pathologies. A total of 8 and 6 subjects had previous cardiac surgery and atrial fibrillation respectively, thus requiring a warfarin scheduled conversion to low molecular weight heparin. Five patients had a pace maker implant and three patients an abdominal aortic aneurism. No SWL-related complications were found in this series considering both urological and systemic features.
CONCLUSION: SWL represents the treatment of choice for urolithiasis, and it has to be recommended especially to geriatric patients. In those subjects, SWL complications can be avoided with a proper and personalized preparation, together with an ECG and ultrasound continuously monitored procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18937586     DOI: 10.1089/end.2008.9704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy in patients requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents.

Authors:  Bader Alsaikhan; Sero Andonian
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Influence of acetylsalicylic acid and low-molecular weight heparins on the formation of renal hematoma after shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Christoph Schregel; Hubert John; Marco Randazzo; Isabelle Keller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  RE: Renal protective effect of N-acetylcysteine with stepwise ramping voltage against extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-induced renal injury: a prospective randomized trial from Desoky et al.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Is shock wave lithotripsy efficient for the elderly stone formers? Results of a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; Djelali Lamrani; Konstantinos Moraitis; Christian Bach; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-09-08

5.  Metabolic assessment of elderly men with urolithiasis.

Authors:  Celso Heitor Freitas Junior; Eduardo Mazzucchi; Alexandre Danilovic; Artur Henrique Brito; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (≥70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature.

Authors:  Sarah Prattley; James Voss; Stephanie Cheung; Robert Geraghty; Patrick Jones; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  A large series of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the very elderly.

Authors:  Guilherme Braga Lamacchia; Fernando Korkes; Willy Baccaglini; Luiz Gustavo Miolaro de Mello; Marcelo Szwarc; Marcos Tobias-Machado
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-08-20

8.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of residual stones after ureterolithotripsy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhichao Huang; Xiaokun Zhao; Lei Zhang; Zhaohui Zhong; Ran Xu; Lianping Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; D Lamrani; Konstantinos Moraitis; Hassan Wazait; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-05-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.