Literature DB >> 18937057

Philosophical aspects of dual use technologies.

Svitlana V Pustovit1, Erin D Williams.   

Abstract

The term dual use technologies refers to research and technology with the potential both to yield valuable scientific knowledge and to be used for nefarious purposes with serious consequences for public health or the environment. There are two main approaches to assessing dual use technologies: pragmatic and metaphysical. A pragmatic approach relies on ethical principles and norms to generate specific guidance and policy for dual use technologies. A metaphysical approach exhorts us to the deeper study of human nature, our intentions, goals, values ideals and social relations when considering dual use technology. Use of science and technology (S and T) is determined by two components of human nature: human intentions and choices. We have drawn a distinction between specific measures, goals and intentions with respect to technologies in order to show that moral judgment about technologies must precede their use. Understanding of our intentionality and values, and our moral ideals, as a measurable, tangible part of the real world is important for the prevention of any possible harm from S and T. In the context of dual use technologies, we stress the importance of three main understandings of human nature: vulnerability, responsibility and narrative identity. These can become a strong ontological "antidote" to technology's poisoning of modern man. Each new technology can be measured and compared with man's values, traditions and societal norms. This can be done bearing in mind the concept that human nature is not dualistic, but pluralistic. A system of ethical principles that includes the principles of good intentions, the correspondence of goals and means, the balancing of risks and benefits, simplicity, and contextuality, will help ensure that technologies are more humanistic and friendly to human beings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18937057     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9086-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.777


  1 in total

1.  Science and security. Practical experiences in dual-use review.

Authors:  E Megan Davidson; Richard Frothingham; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  "Dual use" and "intentionality": seeking to prevent the manifestation of deliberately harmful objectives: A summary and some reflections on 'The Advancement of Science and the Dilemma of Dual Use: Why We Can't Afford to Fail'.

Authors:  Raymond E Spier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The 'Magic Light': A Discussion on Laser Ethics.

Authors:  Andreas Stylianou; Michael A Talias
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A note on the definition of "dual use".

Authors:  John Forge
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.777

4.  Introducing survival ethics into engineering education and practice.

Authors:  C Verharen; J Tharakan; G Middendorf; M Castro-Sitiriche; G Kadoda
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.777

5.  Dual use research: investigation across multiple science disciplines.

Authors:  Shannon Oltmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.