Literature DB >> 18937053

Technological delegation: responsibility for the unintended.

Katinka Waelbers1.   

Abstract

This article defends three interconnected premises that together demand for a new way of dealing with moral responsibility in developing and using technological artifacts. The first premise is that humans increasingly make use of dissociated technological delegation. Second, because technologies do not simply fulfill our actions, but rather mediate them, the initial aims alter and outcomes are often different from those intended. Third, since the outcomes are often unforeseen and unintended, we can no longer simply apply the traditional (modernist) models for discussing moral responsibility. We need to reinterpret moral responsibility. A schematic layout of a model on Social Role-Responsibility that incorporates these three premises is presented to allow discussion of a new way of interpreting moral responsibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18937053     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Responsible engineering: the importance of character and imagination.

Authors:  M S Pritchard
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Commentary on "The social responsibilities of biological scientists" (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger)

Authors:  Aaron A Salzberg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Co-responsibility for research integrity.

Authors:  Carl Mitcham
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  What next after determinism in the ontology of technology? Distributing responsibility in the biofuel debate.

Authors:  Philip Boucher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Engineers and Active Responsibility.

Authors:  Udo Pesch
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Ethics in actor networks, or: what Latour could learn from Darwin and Dewey.

Authors:  Katinka Waelbers; Philipp Dorstewitz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Designing a good life: a matrix for the technological mediation of morality.

Authors:  Tsjalling Swierstra; Katinka Waelbers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Contested Technologies and Design for Values: The Case of Shale Gas.

Authors:  Marloes Dignum; Aad Correljé; Eefje Cuppen; Udo Pesch; Behnam Taebi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Adopting Safe-by-Design in Science and Engineering Academia: The Soil May Need Tilling.

Authors:  Sam Jan Cees Krouwel; Emma Rianne Dierickx; Sara Heesterbeek; Pim Klaassen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  (Re)Conceptualizing decision-making tools in a risk governance framework for emerging technologies-the case of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Martin Mullins; Martin Himly; Isabel Rodríguez Llopis; Irini Furxhi; Sabine Hofer; Norbert Hofstätter; Peter Wick; Daina Romeo; Dana Küehnel; Kirsi Siivola; Julia Catalán; Kerstin Hund-Rinke; Ioannis Xiarchos; Shona Linehan; Daan Schuurbiers; Amaia García Bilbao; Leire Barruetabeña; Damjana Drobne
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2022-07-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.