Literature DB >> 18937013

Discussing coronary risk with patients to improve blood pressure treatment: secondary results from the CHECK-UP study.

Steven A Grover1, Ilka Lowensteyn, Lawrence Joseph, Mohammed Kaouache, Sylvie Marchand, Louis Coupal, Ghislain Boudreau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hypertension is common among patients with dyslipidemia but is often poorly treated. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate how a decision aid, used by primary care physicians to improve lipid therapy, impacted on the treatment of hypertension. STUDY
DESIGN: Data were analyzed from patients enrolled in a randomized trial focusing primarily on the treatment of dyslipidemia. Patients received usual care or a coronary risk profile every three months to monitor the risk reduction following lifestyle changes and/or pharmacotherapy to treat dyslipidemia. Hypertension management was assessed based on a post hoc analysis of individuals whose blood pressure exceeded current national hypertension guidelines.
RESULTS: There were 2,631 subjects who completed the study. Among 1,352 patients without diagnosed hypertension, 30% were above target on at least three consecutive visits. Among 1,279 individuals with known hypertension, 69% were above target on at least two consecutive visits. Overall, patients receiving risk profiles were more likely to receive appropriate antihypertensive therapy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) compared to those receiving usual care. After adjustment for inter-physician variability and potential confounders, the use of the risk profile was associated with an increased likelihood of starting therapy (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.06-3.00) or modifying therapy (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.91).
CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical trial of dyslipidemia management, inadequately controlled hypertension was common, occurring in nearly 50% of individuals. Ongoing coronary risk assessment was associated with more appropriate blood pressure management. Cardiovascular risk assessment decision aids should be further evaluated in a randomized trial of hypertension therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18937013      PMCID: PMC2607501          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0825-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  29 in total

1.  Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States.

Authors:  D J Hyman; V N Pavlik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Can we alter physician behavior by educational methods? Lessons learned from studies of the management and follow-up of hypertension.

Authors:  Karen Tu; Dave Davis
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

Authors:  Thomas A Pearson; Steven N Blair; Stephen R Daniels; Robert H Eckel; Joan M Fair; Stephen P Fortmann; Barry A Franklin; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Greenland; Scott M Grundy; Yuling Hong; Nancy Houston Miller; Ronald M Lauer; Ira S Ockene; Ralph L Sacco; James F Sallis; Sidney C Smith; Neil J Stone; Kathryn A Taubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Why most interventions to improve physician prescribing do not seem to work.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: a long and winding road.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Finlay A McAlister; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; T Fahey; T J Peters; C MacIntosh; D J Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

7.  European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Guy De Backer; Ettore Ambrosioni; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Carlos Brotons; Renata Cifkova; Jean Dallongeville; Shah Ebrahim; Ole Faergeman; Ian Graham; Giuseppe Mancia; Volkert Manger Cats; Kristina Orth-Gomér; Joep Perk; Kalevi Pyörälä; José L Rodicio; Susana Sans; Vedat Sansoy; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Troels Thomsen; David Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The 2004 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part II--Therapy.

Authors:  Nadia A Khan; Finlay A McAlister; Norman R C Campbell; Ross D Feldman; Simon Rabkin; Jeff Mahon; Richard Lewanczuk; Kelly B Zarnke; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Marcel Lebel; Mitchell Levine; Carol Herbert
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gary Parkes; Trisha Greenhalgh; Mark Griffin; Richard Dent
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-03-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program guidelines for pharmacists: An update.

Authors:  Yazid N Al Hamarneh; Sherilyn K D Houle; Raj Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2016-10-06

Review 2.  Risk scoring for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kunal N Karmali; Stephen D Persell; Pablo Perel; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mark A Berendsen; Mark D Huffman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-14

3.  The preventing recurrent vascular events and neurological worsening through intensive organized case-management (PREVENTION) trial protocol [clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00931788].

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep S Padwal; Miriam Fradette; Ann Thompson; Ross Tsuyuki; Steven A Grover; Naeem Dean; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study).

Authors:  Elisabeth Joye Petr; Colby R Ayers; Ambarish Pandey; James A de Lemos; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Amit Khera; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Jarett D Berry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Nurses’ compliance with prevention of mother-to-child transmission national guidelines in selected sites in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Augustin R M Amboko; Petra Brysiewicz
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2015-08-13

6.  Mobile Phone-Based Lifestyle Intervention for Reducing Overall Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Guangzhou, China: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zhiting Liu; Songting Chen; Guanrong Zhang; Aihua Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Lifestyle educational program strongly increases compliance to nonpharmacologic intervention in hypertensive patients: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Aldo L Ferrara; Delia Pacioni; Valentina Di Fronzo; Barbara F Russo; Laura Staiano; Enza Speranza; Rosaria Gente; Francesco Gargiulo; Fabio Ferrara
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Animated randomness, avatars, movement, and personalization in risk graphics.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Nicole Exe; Mark Dickson; Lisa Holtzman; Valerie C Kahn; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Impact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emma Wallace; Maike J M Uijen; Barbara Clyne; Atieh Zarabzadeh; Claire Keogh; Rose Galvin; Susan M Smith; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Impact of provision of cardiovascular disease risk estimates to healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Barbora Silarova; Ewoud Schuit; Karel G M Moons; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.