Literature DB >> 18936500

Addition of sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized trial.

Gérald Simonneau1, Lewis J Rubin, Nazzareno Galiè, Robyn J Barst, Thomas R Fleming, Adaani E Frost, Peter J Engel, Mordechai R Kramer, Gary Burgess, Lorraine Collings, Nandini Cossons, Olivier Sitbon, David B Badesch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral sildenafil and intravenous epoprostenol have independently been shown to be effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of adding oral sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
DESIGN: A 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
SETTING: Multinational study at 41 centers in 11 countries from 3 July 2003 to 27 January 2006. PATIENTS: 267 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (idiopathic, associated anorexigen use or connective tissue disease, or corrected congenital heart disease) who were receiving long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or sildenafil, 20 mg three times daily, titrated to 40 mg and 80 mg three times daily, as tolerated, at 4-week intervals. Of 265 patients who received treatment, 256 (97%) patients (123 in the placebo group and 133 in the sildenafil group) completed the study. MEASUREMENTS: Change from baseline in exercise capacity measured by 6-minute walk distance (primary end point) and hemodynamic measurements, time to clinical worsening, and Borg dyspnea score (secondary end points).
RESULTS: A placebo-adjusted increase of 28.8 meters (95% CI, 13.9 to 43.8 meters) in the 6-minute walk distance occurred in patients in the sildenafil group; these improvements were most prominent among patients with baseline distances of 325 meters or more. Relative to epoprostenol monotherapy, addition of sildenafil resulted in a greater change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure by -3.8 mm Hg (CI, -5.6 to -2.1 mm Hg); cardiac output by 0.9 L/min (CI, 0.5 to 1.2 L/min); and longer time to clinical worsening, with a smaller proportion of patients experiencing a worsening event in the sildenafil group (0.062) than in the placebo group (0.195) by week 16 (P = 0.002). Health-related quality of life also improved in patients who received combined therapy compared with those who received epoprostenol monotherapy. There was no effect on the Borg dyspnea score. Of the side effects generally associated with sildenafil treatment, the most commonly reported in the placebo and sildenafil groups, respectively, were headache (34% and 57%; difference, 23 percentage points [CI, 12 to 35 percentage points]), dyspepsia (2% and 16%; difference, 13 percentage points [CI, 7 to 20 percentage points]), pain in extremity (18% and 25%; difference, 8 percentage points [CI, -2 to 18 percentage points]), and nausea (18% and 25%; difference, 8 percentage points [CI, -2 to 18 percentage points]). LIMITATIONS: The study excluded patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with other causes. There was an imbalance in missing data between groups, with 8 placebo recipients having no postbaseline walk assessment compared with 1 sildenafil recipient. These patients were excluded from the analysis.
CONCLUSION: In some patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, the addition of sildenafil to long-term intravenous epoprostenol therapy improves exercise capacity, hemodynamic measurements, time to clinical worsening, and quality of life, but not Borg dyspnea score. Increased rates of headache and dyspepsia occurred with the addition of sildenafil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936500     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-8-200810210-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  144 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Stephen C Mathai; Paul M Hassoun
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 2.  An update on the evaluation and management of pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma.

Authors:  John G Coghlan; Benjamin Schreiber; Benjamin Schrieber
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  The minimal important difference in the 6-minute walk test for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Stephen C Mathai; Milo A Puhan; Diana Lam; Robert A Wise
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Basic science of pulmonary arterial hypertension for clinicians: new concepts and experimental therapies.

Authors:  Stephen L Archer; E Kenneth Weir; Martin R Wilkins
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Update on pulmonary hypertension 2009.

Authors:  Mark T Gladwin; Hossein-Ardeschir Ghofrani
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 6.  Targeted therapy for systemic sclerosis: how close are we?

Authors:  Manuel Ramos-Casals; Vicent Fonollosa-Pla; Pilar Brito-Zerón; Antoni Sisó-Almirall
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 7.  Lung involvement in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Paul M Hassoun
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 8.  Targeted oral therapies in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Zeenat Safdar
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  Evolving management of pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: impact of phosphodiesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  Andrew James Wardle; Robert M R Tulloh
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  A dosing/cross-development study of the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  M Gomberg-Maitland; M L Maitland; R J Barst; L Sugeng; S Coslet; T J Perrino; L Bond; M E Lacouture; S L Archer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.