OBJECTIVE: To characterize nodular melanoma (NM) using dermoscopy, in vivo reflectance-mode confocal microscopy, and histopathologic analysis. DESIGN: Consecutive pure NMs and superficial spreading melanomas (SSMs) with nodular or blue areas were studied using dermoscopy and confocal microscopy, and a correlation with histopathologic findings was performed. MATERIALS: Ten NMs, 10 SSMs with a nodular area, and 10 SSMs with a blue palpable but not yet nodular area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Confocal differences within the nodular component between pure NMs and SSMs with a nodular area, hypothesizing different biological behaviors. RESULTS: Whereas NMs had predominantly nonspecific global dermoscopic patterns, SSMs exhibited a multicomponent pattern and higher dermoscopic scores. Globules, blue-white veil, atypical vessels, and structureless areas were frequent in NMs and in nodular areas from SSMs. At confocal microscopy, NMs exhibited few pagetoid cells within a typical epidermal architecture in the superficial layers in most cases, differing from SSMs frequently characterized by epidermal disarrangement and pagetoid infiltration. At the dermoepidermal junction, dermal papillae were rarely seen in nodular areas both from NMs and from SSMs, frequently substituted by nonaggregated atypical cells distributed in sheetlike structures. In the upper dermis, all groups exhibited plump bright cells, dense dishomogeneous cell clusters, and atypical nucleated cells, whereas cerebriform clusters were characteristic of NMs. Conclusion Distinctive dermoscopic and confocal features seen in NMs compared with SSMs are helpful in making the diagnosis and suggest different biological behavior.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize nodular melanoma (NM) using dermoscopy, in vivo reflectance-mode confocal microscopy, and histopathologic analysis. DESIGN: Consecutive pure NMs and superficial spreading melanomas (SSMs) with nodular or blue areas were studied using dermoscopy and confocal microscopy, and a correlation with histopathologic findings was performed. MATERIALS: Ten NMs, 10 SSMs with a nodular area, and 10 SSMs with a blue palpable but not yet nodular area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Confocal differences within the nodular component between pure NMs and SSMs with a nodular area, hypothesizing different biological behaviors. RESULTS: Whereas NMs had predominantly nonspecific global dermoscopic patterns, SSMs exhibited a multicomponent pattern and higher dermoscopic scores. Globules, blue-white veil, atypical vessels, and structureless areas were frequent in NMs and in nodular areas from SSMs. At confocal microscopy, NMs exhibited few pagetoid cells within a typical epidermal architecture in the superficial layers in most cases, differing from SSMs frequently characterized by epidermal disarrangement and pagetoid infiltration. At the dermoepidermal junction, dermal papillae were rarely seen in nodular areas both from NMs and from SSMs, frequently substituted by nonaggregated atypical cells distributed in sheetlike structures. In the upper dermis, all groups exhibited plump bright cells, dense dishomogeneous cell clusters, and atypical nucleated cells, whereas cerebriform clusters were characteristic of NMs. Conclusion Distinctive dermoscopic and confocal features seen in NMs compared with SSMs are helpful in making the diagnosis and suggest different biological behavior.
Authors: Laura Poliseno; Adele Haimovic; Miguel F Segura; Douglas Hanniford; Paul J Christos; Farbod Darvishian; Jinhua Wang; Richard L Shapiro; Anna C Pavlick; Russell S Berman; Eva Hernando; Jiri Zavadil; Iman Osman Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Clio Dessinioti; Niki Dimou; Alan C Geller; Aravella Stergiopoulou; Serigne Lo; Ulrike Keim; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Lauren E Haydu; Simone Ribero; Pietro Quaglino; Susana Puig; Josep Malvehy; Lidija Kandolf-Sekulovic; Tatjana Radevic; Roland Kaufmann; Laura Meister; Eduardo Nagore; Victor Traves; Grigorios G Champsas; Mihaela Plaka; Brigitte Dreno; Emilie Varey; David Moreno Ramirez; Reinhard Dummer; Joanna Mangana; Axel Hauschild; Friederike Egberts; Ketty Peris; Laura Del Regno; Ana-Maria Forsea; Sabina A Zurac; Ricardo Vieira; Ana Brinca; Iris Zalaudek; Teresa Deinlein; Eleni Linos; Evangelos Evangelou; John F Thompson; Richard A Scolyer; Claus Garbe; Alexander J Stratigos Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Alice Casari; Giovanni Pellacani; Stefania Seidenari; Anna Maria Cesinaro; Francesca Beretti; Patrizia Pepe; Caterina Longo Journal: J Skin Cancer Date: 2010-10-14
Authors: Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Konstantinos Liopyris; Jilliana Monnier; Saud Aleissa; Lindsay M Boyce; Caterina Longo; Margaret Oliviero; Harold Rabinovitz; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Allan C Halpern; Giovanni Pellacani; Alon Scope; Manu Jain Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 11.527