OBJECTIVE: To define factors that acutely influenced swallowing function prior to and during concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. DESIGN: A summary score from 1 to 7 (the swallowing performance status scale [SPS]) of oral and pharyngeal impairment, aspiration, and diet, was assigned to each patient study by a single senior speech and swallow pathologist, with higher scores indicating worse swallowing. Generalized linear regression models were formulated to asses the effects of patient factors (performance status, smoking intensity, amount of alcohol ingestion, and age), tumor factors (primary site, T stage, and N stage), and treatment-related factors (radiation dose, use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, response to induction chemotherapy, postchemoradiotherapy neck dissection, and preprotocol surgery) on the differences between SPS score before and after treatment. SETTING: University hospital tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: The study included 95 patients treated under a multiple institution, phase 2 protocol who underwent a videofluorographic oropharyngeal motility (OPM) study to assess swallowing function prior to and within 1 to 2 months after the completion of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with swallowing changes after chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: The mean pretreatment and posttreatment OPM scores were 3.09 and 3.77, respectively. Patients with T3 or T4 tumors (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.95; P = .04) and a performance status of 1 or 2 (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91; P = .03) were less likely to have worsening of swallowing after chemoradiotherapy. There was a trend for worse swallowing with increasing age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09; P = .08). Only T stage (T3 or T4) was associated with improved swallowing after treatment (OR, 8.96; 95% CI, 1.9-41.5; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, improved swallowing function over baseline is associated with advanced T stage.
OBJECTIVE: To define factors that acutely influenced swallowing function prior to and during concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. DESIGN: A summary score from 1 to 7 (the swallowing performance status scale [SPS]) of oral and pharyngeal impairment, aspiration, and diet, was assigned to each patient study by a single senior speech and swallow pathologist, with higher scores indicating worse swallowing. Generalized linear regression models were formulated to asses the effects of patient factors (performance status, smoking intensity, amount of alcohol ingestion, and age), tumor factors (primary site, T stage, and N stage), and treatment-related factors (radiation dose, use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, response to induction chemotherapy, postchemoradiotherapy neck dissection, and preprotocol surgery) on the differences between SPS score before and after treatment. SETTING: University hospital tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: The study included 95 patients treated under a multiple institution, phase 2 protocol who underwent a videofluorographic oropharyngeal motility (OPM) study to assess swallowing function prior to and within 1 to 2 months after the completion of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors associated with swallowing changes after chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: The mean pretreatment and posttreatment OPM scores were 3.09 and 3.77, respectively. Patients with T3 or T4 tumors (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.95; P = .04) and a performance status of 1 or 2 (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91; P = .03) were less likely to have worsening of swallowing after chemoradiotherapy. There was a trend for worse swallowing with increasing age (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09; P = .08). Only T stage (T3 or T4) was associated with improved swallowing after treatment (OR, 8.96; 95% CI, 1.9-41.5; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, improved swallowing function over baseline is associated with advanced T stage.
Authors: Claudia I Chapuy; Donald J Annino; Anna Snavely; Yi Li; Roy B Tishler; Charles M Norris; Robert I Haddad; Laura A Goguen Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Bharat B Mittal; Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Muveddet Discekici-Harris; Irene B Helenowski; Ann Mellot; Mark Agulnik; Jerilyn A Logemann Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Avraham Eisbruch; Hyungjin M Kim; Felix Y Feng; Teresa H Lyden; Marc J Haxer; Mary Feng; Frank P Worden; Carol R Bradford; Mark E Prince; Jeffrey S Moyer; Gregory T Wolf; Douglas B Chepeha; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tommy Sheu; Clifton David Fuller; Tito R Mendoza; Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; Beth M Beadle; Jack Phan; Steven J Frank; Ehab Y Hanna; Charles Lu; Charles S Cleeland; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Ronald J Maggiore; Emily K Curran; Mary Ellyn Witt; Daniel J Haraf; Everett E Vokes; Ezra E W Cohen Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 3.599