Literature DB >> 18936325

Patient satisfaction and its relationship with quality and outcomes of care after acute myocardial infarction.

Douglas S Lee1, Jack V Tu, Alice Chong, David A Alter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is a widely used measurement for the evaluation of medical care. We examined the extent to which quality of care received after acute myocardial infarction predicted subsequent patient satisfaction with care and whether patient satisfaction itself was associated with long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a longitudinal cohort of acute myocardial infarction, we examined the associations of patient-reported satisfaction with care with clinical characteristics, physical and psychological function measures, quality indicators of myocardial infarction care, and outcomes. Among 1933 eligible patients (mean age 62.9+/-12.8 years, 70.5% men), 1866 survey respondents were analyzed. Of the study cohort, 1711 (91.7%) reported that they were satisfied with their overall care. Patients who reported satisfaction with care were older (mean age 63.1+/-12.7 versus 60.1+/-13.3 years, P=0.005), had improved physical function, and were less likely to be depressed. Better physical function, measured by the Specific Activity Scale, predicted higher satisfaction, with an OR of 1.75 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.68, P=0.008) for intermediate versus poor function and 2.96 (1.39 to 7.34, P=0.009) for high versus poor function, after adjustment for age, sex, income tertile, and ethnicity. Depression was the major predictor of dissatisfaction with overall care, with an OR of 0.44 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.67, P<0.001). Quality indicators for myocardial infarction care and clinical outcomes were not associated with patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with care was more likely in patients who were older, in those without depression, and in those with better functional capacity, but it was not associated with the quality of myocardial infarction care or survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936325     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.792713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

1.  Incentives to increase patient satisfaction: are we doing more harm than good?

Authors:  Jay Detsky; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Filling the gaps between performance incentive programs and health care quality improvement.

Authors:  Romana Hasnain-Wynia; Muriel Jean-Jacques
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Patient satisfaction at America's lowest performing hospitals.

Authors:  Saket Girotra; Peter Cram; Ioana Popescu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-04-10

4.  Relationship between surgical oncologic outcomes and publically reported hospital quality and satisfaction measures.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; Ling Chen; Alfred I Neugut; Catherine A Richards; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Evaluation of patient satisfaction with nursing services before and after implementation of the Health System Transformation Plan in Iran: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yadollah Jannati; Abolfazl Babajani; Maedeh Ghasemi Kolaei; Hossein Mohsenipouya; Nouraddin Mousavinasab; Mohammad A H Gorji; Mohammed A Mamun
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-21

6.  Patient- and family-centered care: a qualitative exploration of oncologist perspectives.

Authors:  Timothy K Nguyen; Glenn S Bauman; Christopher J Watling; Karin Hahn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Expectations about and experiences with insulin therapy contribute to diabetes treatment satisfaction in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A N Naegeli; R P Hayes
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Split-care patients and their caregivers: how collaborative is collaborative care?

Authors:  Rachel Levine Baruch; Bella Vishnevsky; Thomas Kalman
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  Impact of patient satisfaction ratings on physicians and clinical care.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zgierska; David Rabago; Michael M Miller
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Limited use of price and quality advertising among American hospitals.

Authors:  David B Muhlestein; Chrisanne E A Wilks; Jason P Richter
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.