Literature DB >> 1893370

An analysis of monoclonal antibody distribution in microscopic tumor nodules: consequences of a "binding site barrier".

W van Osdol1, K Fujimori, J N Weinstein.   

Abstract

Rational in vivo application of monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis and therapy of cancer requires an understanding of both the global and microscopic pharmacology of macromolecular ligands. Here, we introduce a new mathematical model for antibody distribution into small, prevascular, densely packed nodules (representing either primary or metastatic tumor). For the analysis, we link together several aspects of antibody pharmacology: the global (whole body) pharmacokinetics; transcapillary transport into normal tissue interstitium surrounding the nodule; diffusion into the nodule; nonspecific binding and/or partitioning; specific binding to tumor antigen; metabolism; and lymphatic outflow from the tissue space. Input parameter values are estimated from experimental studies in vitro, in animals, and in clinical trials. Our aim is to explore the sensitivity of antibody localization to variation in three of the important parameters of this model: the rate of transcapillary transport; the rate of lymphatic outflow; and the antigen density. Predictions based on this analysis include the following: (a) High rates of transcapillary transport influx or low rates of lymphatic efflux will enhance antibody percolation into the tumor nodule at early times after injection and increase the average antibody concentration in the tumor at all times; (b) Changes in antibody influx rate will affect the antibody distribution in the tumor at earlier times than do changes in the efflux rate; (c) Reducing the antigen concentration will increase the uniformity of antibody penetration but lower the average concentration in the tumor at all times after injection; and (d) Counter to intuition, lowering the antigen concentration can increase the peak concentrations achieved toward the center of the nodule. If, in addition, there is any metabolism of bound antibody, the concentration-time integral (i.e., the "area under the curve") for the center of the nodule will also be increased by decreasing the antigen concentration. These predictions directly reflect the "binding site barrier" hypothesis of Weinstein et al. (Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 507: 199-210, 1987) and Fujimori et al. (Cancer Res., 49:5656-5663, 1989; J. Nucl. Med., 31:1191-1198, 1990). In general, and perhaps surprisingly until one considers the problem carefully, the parameters governing antibody percolation can have opposite effects on the uniformity of antibody distribution at early and late times. These calculations, using the PERC program set, were done for antibodies, but we believe that the "binding site barrier" will also prove important for other injected macromolecules, for at least some highly bindable injected small molecules, for lymphokines and cytokines released from transfected cells injected in vivo, and, indeed, for endogenous species such as the autocrine-paracrine factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1893370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  43 in total

Review 1.  Antibody vectors for imaging.

Authors:  Tove Olafsen; Anna M Wu
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Cytokine binding by polysaccharide-antibody conjugates.

Authors:  Liang Tso Sun; Kyle S Buchholz; Michael T Lotze; Newell R Washburn
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  A model for optimizing delivery of targeted radionuclide therapies into resection cavity margins for the treatment of primary brain cancers.

Authors:  Raghu Raghavan; Roger W Howell; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-05-05

Review 4.  Fluorescent molecular imaging: technical progress and current preclinical and clinical applications in urogynecologic diseases.

Authors:  V M Alexander; P L Choyke; H Kobayashi
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 5.  Antibody Drug Conjugates: Application of Quantitative Pharmacology in Modality Design and Target Selection.

Authors:  S Sadekar; I Figueroa; M Tabrizi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Investigating the optimal size of anticancer nanomedicine.

Authors:  Li Tang; Xujuan Yang; Qian Yin; Kaimin Cai; Hua Wang; Isthier Chaudhury; Catherine Yao; Qin Zhou; Mincheol Kwon; James A Hartman; Iwona T Dobrucki; Lawrence W Dobrucki; Luke B Borst; Stéphane Lezmi; William G Helferich; Andrew L Ferguson; Timothy M Fan; Jianjun Cheng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Competition of charge-mediated and specific binding by peptide-tagged cationic liposome-DNA nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Emily Wonder; Lorena Simón-Gracia; Pablo Scodeller; Ramsey N Majzoub; Venkata Ramana Kotamraju; Kai K Ewert; Tambet Teesalu; Cyrus R Safinya
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Target mediated disposition of T84.66, a monoclonal anti-CEA antibody: application in the detection of colorectal cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Shweta R Urva; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  Development of an EGFRvIII specific recombinant antibody.

Authors:  Puja Gupta; Shuang-Yin Han; Marina Holgado-Madruga; Siddhartha S Mitra; Gordon Li; Ryan T Nitta; Albert J Wong
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 10.  Targeting of drugs and nanoparticles to tumors.

Authors:  Erkki Ruoslahti; Sangeeta N Bhatia; Michael J Sailor
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.