Literature DB >> 18931656

Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics.

Matthew D Holland1, Alan Hastings.   

Abstract

A central question in ecology with great importance for management, conservation and biological control is how changing connectivity affects the persistence and dynamics of interacting species. Researchers in many disciplines have used large systems of coupled oscillators to model the behaviour of a diverse array of fluctuating systems in nature. In the well-studied regime of weak coupling, synchronization is favoured by increases in coupling strength and large-scale network structures (for example 'small worlds') that produce short cuts and clustering. Here we show that, by contrast, randomizing the structure of dispersal networks in a model of predators and prey tends to favour asynchrony and prolonged transient dynamics, with resulting effects on the amplitudes of population fluctuations. Our results focus on synchronization and dynamics of clusters in models, and on timescales, more appropriate for ecology, namely smaller systems with strong interactions outside the weak-coupling regime, rather than the better-studied cases of large, weakly coupled systems. In these smaller systems, the dynamics of transients and the effects of changes in connectivity can be well understood using a set of methods including numerical reconstructions of phase dynamics, examinations of cluster formation and the consideration of important aspects of cyclic dynamics, such as amplitude.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931656     DOI: 10.1038/nature07395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  29 in total

1.  Ecological processes can synchronize marine population dynamics over continental scales.

Authors:  Tarik C Gouhier; Frédéric Guichard; Bruce A Menge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Network synchronization landscape reveals compensatory structures, quantization, and the positive effect of negative interactions.

Authors:  Takashi Nishikawa; Adilson E Motter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Use of multiple dispersal pathways facilitates amphibian persistence in stream networks.

Authors:  Evan H Campbell Grant; James D Nichols; Winsor H Lowe; William F Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cluster formation in a heterogeneous metapopulation model.

Authors:  Jacques A L Silva
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Local retention, dispersal and fluctuating connectivity among populations of a coral reef fish.

Authors:  J Derek Hogan; Roger J Thiessen; Peter F Sale; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Rescuing ecosystems from extinction cascades through compensatory perturbations.

Authors:  Sagar Sahasrabudhe; Adilson E Motter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The effects of connectivity on metapopulation persistence: network symmetry and degree correlations.

Authors:  Elad Shtilerman; Lewi Stone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Meta-ecosystem dynamics and functioning on finite spatial networks.

Authors:  Justin N Marleau; Frédéric Guichard; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Maximising the clustering coefficient of networks and the effects on habitat network robustness.

Authors:  Henriette Heer; Lucas Streib; Ralf B Schäfer; Stefan Ruzika
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Connectivity, cycles, and persistence thresholds in metapopulation networks.

Authors:  Yael Artzy-Randrup; Lewi Stone
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.