Literature DB >> 18931480

Genomic signatures of chromosomal instability and osteosarcoma progression detected by high resolution array CGH and interphase FISH.

S Selvarajah1, M Yoshimoto, O Ludkovski, P C Park, J Bayani, P Thorner, G Maire, J A Squire, M Zielenska.   

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is characterized by an unstable karyotype which typically has a heterogeneous pattern of complex chromosomal abnormalities. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in combination with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses provides a complete description of genomic imbalances together with an evaluation of the contribution of cell-to-cell variation to copy number changes. There have been no analyses to date documenting genomic signatures consistent with chromosomal instability mechanisms in OS tumors using array CGH. In this study, we utilized high-resolution array CGH to identify and characterize recurrent signatures of genomic imbalances using ten OS tumors. Comparison between the genomic profiles identified tumor groups with low, intermediate and high levels of genomic imbalance. Bands 6p22-->p21, 8q24 and 17p12--> p11.2 were consistently involved in high copy gain or amplification events. Since these three locations have been consistently associated with OS oncogenesis, FISH probes from each cytoband were used to derive an index of cellular heterogeneity for copy number within each region. OS with the highest degree of genomic imbalance also exhibited the most extreme cell-to-cell copy number variation. Significantly, the three OS with the most imbalance and genomic copy number heterogeneity also had the poorest response to preoperative chemotherapy. This genome wide analysis is the first utilizing oligonucleotide array CGH in combination with FISH analysis to derive genomic signatures of chromosomal instability in OS tumors by studying genomic imbalance and intercellular heterogeneity. This comprehensive genomic screening approach provides important insights concerning the mechanisms responsible for generating complex genomes. The resulting phenotypic diversity can generate tumors with a propensity for an aggressive disease course. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms leading to OS tumor development could result in the identification of prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931480     DOI: 10.1159/000151310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  28 in total

1.  Frequent attenuation of the WWOX tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma is associated with increased tumorigenicity and aberrant RUNX2 expression.

Authors:  Kyle C Kurek; Sara Del Mare; Zaidoun Salah; Suhaib Abdeen; Hussain Sadiq; Suk-Hee Lee; Eugenio Gaudio; Nicola Zanesi; Kevin B Jones; Barry DeYoung; Gail Amir; Mark Gebhardt; Matthew Warman; Gary S Stein; Janet L Stein; Jane B Lian; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Genetic variation at chromosome 8q24 in osteosarcoma cases and controls.

Authors:  Lisa Mirabello; Sonja I Berndt; Guillermo F Seratti; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; Salma Chowdhury; Kedest Teshome; Arinze Uzoka; Chester Douglass; Richard B Hayes; Robert N Hoover; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Tracing the tumor lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Role of the WWOX tumor suppressor gene in bone homeostasis and the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Sara Del Mare; Kyle C Kurek; Gary S Stein; Jane B Lian; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Hypoxia-related microRNA-210 is a diagnostic marker for discriminating osteoblastoma and osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Scott M Riester; Jorge Torres-Mora; Amel Dudakovic; Emily T Camilleri; Wei Wang; Fuhua Xu; Roman R Thaler; Jared M Evans; René Zwartbol; Inge H Briaire-de Bruijn; Avudaiappan Maran; Andrew L Folpe; Carrie Y Inwards; Peter S Rose; Thomas C Shives; Michael J Yaszemski; Franklin H Sim; David R Deyle; Annalise N Larson; Mario A Galindo; Arjen G H Cleven; Andre M Oliveira; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Judith V M G Bovée; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  Soft tissue sarcomas with complex genomic profiles.

Authors:  Louis Guillou; Alain Aurias
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Long non-coding RNA tumor suppressor candidate 7 functions as a tumor suppressor and inhibits proliferation in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Menglin Cong; Jianmin Li; Rui Jing; Zhenzhong Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-01-19

Review 8.  Benefits of molecular pathology in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disease : Part II of a two-part review: bone tumors and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  Adrienne M Flanagan; David Delaney; Paul O'Donnell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Fusion between cancer cells and myofibroblasts is involved in osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Ling Yu; Weichun Guo; Shenghao Zhao; Fuan Wang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Authors:  Hernán Correa
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2016-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.